Political Science is a Cult (WEF, compulsory vaccinations, Agenda 2030)

This video is about the difference between natural science and totalitarian ideologies, such as forced vaccination or the plans made by the World Economic Forum or the Agenda 2030.

outro
music: Massive Attack - Angel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLzrp24F8pc
video material used from: "IN-SHADOW - A Modern Odyssey - Animated Short Film" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j800SVeiS5I

In my hermetic Theory of Everything, I call the path that politics and society have taken unscientific. I am also very critical of the state in general. There is a risk that my statements could be portrayed or interpreted as politically radical.Of course I am not a radical and I also warn against all political ideas that strive for quick system changes and revolutions. I reject any form of activism that uses threats and violence. I also reject vigilante justice and witch hunts that seek to impose punishments without evidence.I am not an absolutist and I am not in favor of abolishing the state and the constitution.When it comes to politics, I think we should remain calm. Hasty revolutions are easy to instrumentalize. Instead of reforming towards centrality and thereby splitting the left and right visions and playing them off against each other, we should slowly decentralize and try to find a compromise between the two visions. Left and right sitting at the same table, understanding each other's perspective and wondering what would be the best political action to protect the population from hardship and external control. So a state should be there to protect individuals from being put into emergency situations. A state should not be there to put people in emergency situations in order to reach political goals.My criticism of vaccinations and policy is not directed at making recommendations based on scientific data. It is also not about questioning the whole of modern science. Nor is it about rejecting the State providing vaccines during a pandemic.My criticism is directed at a political science that sees itself legitimized to construct people from above. Laws of nature are not made up, they are discovered.In the natural science it is about to describe logical and generally valid relations behind the things. In this lies the equality of nature. In equations.Pseudoscience would not be to look for equations, but for sameness.For example, if one claims there is a connection between me and Tom Jones because our name gives the same value in kabbalistic numerology. Or that there would be a connection, if one determines that his body size in CM is the same sum, as quantity of moons in an individual solar system. Or that it is the same value which can be calculated in quantum mechanics. Or from the length ratios of the pyramids. If values are equal, it does not prove a logical connection. Correlation is not equal to causality.The research on vaccinations and the recommendations for vaccination were of course not based on numerology, but on scientific studies and prognoses. One is allowed to be wrong. Being wrong does not make you an unscientist.The frame of science is then left, if one makes from it an obligation to the vaccination, in order to reach the condition that all are vaccinated. One takes all the statistics to conclude that it would be the scientifically and objective correct state, when all people are vaccinated.One declares conditions, which are not given in the reality, to the objective truth. Then it is only a matter of thinking up any punishments, orders and artificial consequences to implement these with monopolized violence, so that this state is reached. They create an artificial causality.For example, a scientific causality is the following: " Release the apple. Apple falls to the ground". That is cause and effect. Action and consequence.No scientific causality is "If 50% are not vaccinated, no one in society can visit their family." This is not true. One can of course care for the sick if one is unvaccinated and one can of course visit the family if less than 50% of the population is vaccinated. There is no causality between being vaccinated and being able to care for or visit someone.The scientific proof of this is the amount of money and effort that had to be spent when trying to create these states.As has been seen, this does not happen by itself. It takes central planning, advertising and violence to make artificial consequences work. Only then does the statement "if you're not vaccinated, you can't work" have anything to do with reality. By monitoring people and then punishing them when they do.This must be clearly differentiated from natural science. Such ideologies cannot be associated with Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, or Tesla.