Deadpool 2 Spoiler Free Review : Are the Chimichangas Still Fresh or are These Stale Left Overs?

In this video, we share our feelings about the latest installment of Deadpool.

Deadpool is such an interesting character in so many ways. He's been bastardized, had his mouth sewn shut, given Weapon-X capabilities and made to look like Ryan Reynolds. He's been through hell! As such when a proper Deadpool movie came out in 2016 it caught people off guard with its 4th-wall breaking, R-Rating, foul-mouthed action humor, and overall fun. Topping the charts after its release a sequel was inevitable, and if you watched the end-credits of the first movie you knew this movie would be all about Cable.

Unlike the first movie, I went into Deadpool 2 with some pretty high expectations. I can't say that Deadpool 2 exceeded expectation but it didn't miss expectations either. They didn't need to spend much time establishing characters we knew, just new ones such as Domino (LOVED!), Cable, Russel and a few others.

I do wish they would have spent a little more time with Blind Al and a little less time with Dopinder. I loved the evolution of Blind Al's character, I thought they made her more into a motherly sort of figure which really fit her. Yes, she was still a smart ass, yes, she still kicked Wade in the balls, but there was also a consoling factor to her that I really dug. Dopinder, however, was just annoying to me and I could have used without him.

Josh Brolin as Cable was awesome. He had the screen presence and weight this character needed. He was gritty, strong, purposed and focused on his mission. You could understand the perspective he came from, even if you didn't agree with him.

The character of Russel was decent initially but I felt that he got more annoying as the movie went on. In the end, I didn't care for this kid at the end of the movie, he is pretty annoying and deplorable and I really rooted against him in the end.

I never thought that I would say that a Deadpool movie had heart but, dear Lord, DP2 hit me hard in the feels and I wasn't expecting that. I thought it was great too, it progressed the story and lead to logical evolutions of character paths.

I loved Deadpool and thought Deadpool 2 was the perfect sequel. It wasn't better, it wasn't worse, it was just a solid and fun ride. There were some... cringeworthy SFX, specifically in one chase scene and a slight lull about 2/3 through but beyond that this was an amazing film. I cannoy wait to see it again and, if you're a fan of the series, you should definitely check it out.

Do you want to send products, donations or gifts in for us to feature on the channel? Send all items to:

RoXolid Productions
208 E Water Street
Farmer City, IL 61842

Looking for some RoXolid Merch? Check out our T-Spring store for shirts and swag at https://teespring.com/roxolid-productions-official-s

Support RoXolid Productions for as low as a dollar a month through our Patreon page, https://www.patreon.com/RoXolid.

You can also support us directly via PayPal at
http://www.paypal.me/GaryKatzer or via our Streamlabs page at https://streamlabs.com/roxolidproductions

Would you like to have your products featured on RoXolid Productions? Do you have Questions? Comments? Email us at RoXolidMail@Gmail.com!!

Follow Us on Twitter @RoXolidStudios

Give us a Like on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/RoXolidProductions/

The footage used in this review are used under the Fair Use laws, referenced below:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L. 102–492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)