Star Wars The Last Jedi Overview: Minor Spoilers - This is NOT the Saga I've Been Waiting For

In this video we discus Star Wars - The Last Jedi, the most recent entry into the Star Wars Saga.

At the end of Star Wars: The Force Awakens fans and critics alike had their thoughts and feelings regarding where the series was going and how it would get there. New characters Finn, Poe, BB-8 and Rey joined Han Solo, Chewbacca, Princess (now General) Leia, C-3PO, R2-D2 and, eventually, Luke Skywalker. The Empire, post Death Star 2 has evolved into the First Order, the Emperor replaced with Supreme Commander Snoke, Darth Vader with Kylo Ren and Governor Tarkin with General Hux. At the end of the Force Awakens we had many questions, especially after seeing the Resistance claim a major victory over the First Order by destroying Starkiller Base. But this victory wouldn't last.

The Last Jedi, at least in my hopes, was to answer questions and fill plot holes generated by it's predecessor. Who was Snoke? Why did he hate Skywalker so much? Who created the map to Ach-To? Why did R2-D2 wake up when he did? Why did Ben Solo turn against Luke Sywalker and the Jedi Order? And who are Rey's Parents?

Well the Last Jedi is a mess, seriously. It feels both too big and not nearly focused enough from the opening crawl. Kylo Ren is more emo then ever, canon is cast aside and you really need to suspend disbelief to believe that characters survive certain attacks. Worst of all the major plot point is that the Resistance seemingly only ha $5 in gas left and no-one thought to grab the can of Liquid Schwartz! And don't get me started on the political statements on how the rich only succeeded on the backs of the poor, how those who are successful only do so by playing both sides against the middle and how everyone is just as special as the next person.

From plot holes to disappointing story moves, throwing the past away and changing characters for the worse I was disappointed in the direction they took with EP VII. It didn't need to be like this but, well, I guess this is the only way it could happen. It was fun, it looked great but in the end it could have been any generic Sci-Fi movie. The jokes fell flat and felt out of place and, overall, Rian Johnson did not deliver IMO and I did not enjoy this nearly as much as I did Rogue One.

Support RoXolid Productions for as low as a dollar a month through our Patreon page, https://www.patreon.com/RoXolid.

You can also support us directly via PayPal at paypal.me/GaryKatzer

Would you like to have your products featured on RoXolid Productions? Do you have Questions? Comments? Email us at RoXolidMail@Gmail.com!!

Follow Us on Twitter @RoXolidStudios

Give us a Like on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/RoXolidProductions/

The footage used in this review are used under the Fair Use laws, referenced below:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2546; Pub. L. 101–650, title VI, § 607, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5132; Pub. L. 102–492, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3145.)