East Palestine soil has cancer-causing chemicals

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. https://www.youtube.com/c/BaldBrad?sub_confirmation=1

Buy Book on Amazon: https://a.co/d/cNfTxqh
Website: https://www.baldbrad.com/
Become a Patriot: https://www.youtube.com/c/BaldBrad/join

In this clip from The Bald Brad Show, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said the soil in East Palestine does not contain dangerous levels of a cancer-causing chemical. However, a past scientific recommendation from the EPA contradicts that assertation.

Earlier this month, Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator Debra Shore said there were "very low levels" of dioxins during a hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

"We detected very low levels, which very quickly went even down to non-detect. Without those primary indicators, it was a very low probability that dioxins would have been created,” Shore told Congress. "They are secondary byproducts of the burning of vinyl chloride, but we were listening to the community and they expressed significant concerns about toxins."

The EPA waited a month before ordering dioxin testing near the toxic Norfolk Southern train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.

Watch the full episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvrTgoGMhHU

#eastpalestine #news #thebaldbradshow

FOLLOW ME:
Podcast: https://thebaldbradshow.podbean.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BaldBrad
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bald.brad/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@bald_brad?lan
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/BaldBrad
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/TheBaldBrad

Business Inquiries: TheBaldBradShow@gmail.com

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.