WHO Regulations and Pandemic Treaty: Is Concern About Loss of Sovereignty Really Misplaced?

UK Column News - 6th March 2023

- Wrong-headed blog by Susan Guest (Substack): Dial back the panic! The WHO cannot ‘steal our sovereignty’ OR ‘subsume our constitution’! Here’s why.
- Peggy Hall, TheHealthyAmerican.org: Four things you need to know about the WHO—likewise misapprehended
- WHO: Report of the Review Committee regarding amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005)—see Digital information and data protection section and Countering misinformation and disinformation section
- Wikipedia: International Health Regulations
- CDC, which would be the American implementing body of the IHR, describes the WHO’s International Health Regulations as “a legally binding agreement”
- Reminder—Thirty years ago: NAFTA (1993, later killed) was likewisecalled “an agreement” when it was actually a treaty requiring US Senate two-thirds approval
- Senator Ron Johnson (Wisconsin): Sen. Johnson leads colleagues in effort to protect American sovereignty against World Health Organization
- Fox News: GOP Mississippi doctor against vaccine mandate runs for governor
- House Bill 154, Idaho Legislature
- The Blaze—Horowitz: Tennessee lawmkaer introduces the single most important bill for the life of our Constitution
- House Bill 726, Tennessee Legislature
- Katherine Watt (Bailiwick News on Substack): Rep. Bud Hulsey in Tennessee understands the scale of the Constitutional crisis, and what states can and should do to respond
- The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates (state nullification) is espoused in Section 8 of Hulsey’s Bill
- Alberta Sovereignty Within A United Canada Act has received King Charles’ Royal Assent (15 December 2022)
- Reclaim The Net: Canadian premiers tell PM Justin Trudeau they won’t be sharing citizens’ medical data with federal government
- CommonLawConstitution.org—Urgent: When writing to your MP

 Sources: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-6th-march-2023

https://t.me/CHDEurope