COURT CRUSHES ATF RULE BLOCKED BY INJUNCTION!! BREAKING! Vanderstok v Garland

Ex-Prosecutor Tom Grieve takes you inside the court room.

In Vanderstok v. Garland, filed in the Federal Northern District Court of Texas, Judge Reed O'Connor issued a preliminary injunction on March 3, 2023 BLOCKING the ATF frame/receiver rule. Critically, this means that the judge ruled that the plaintiffs (the people suing the ATF) could check each of the following four boxes:

(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits;
(2) a substantial threat of irreparable harm;
(3) that the balance of hardships weighs in their favor; and
(4) that the issuance of the preliminary injunction will not disserve the public interest

Most notably, number 1 above strongly suggests that the lawsuit is on a path for a victory.

What does this mean in detail? What are the next steps? Check out the video for the scoop.

The details from the inside: suing the ATF in the pistol Brace case
https://youtu.be/0rWa5OTXCm0

Pistol Brace Ban dead on arrival?!
https://youtu.be/-uJLBvgUtPQ

(Interview) MASSIVE: Sheriff tells ATF NO will STOP ATF agents!
https://youtu.be/aT-DH4Zx54k

When do PARTS become GUNS and YOU go to PRISON
https://youtu.be/FMLfR62nJHM

Legal Disclaimer: nothing in this video is offered as legal advice or a formation of attorney-client relationship. If you want to hire my firm to be a client, you need to do just that and hire us... not watch us on the internet. If that offends your delicate sensibilities, just stop and be an adult. If you are outside of Wisconsin and want an attorney, contact one near where you are and stop trying to blame the internet and other people for your problems.

Link to attorney Tom Grieve's brief bio
https://www.grievelaw.com/CriminalDefenseAttorneys/TomGrieve

#2ndamendment #atf #guncontrol