Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bb4e/4bb4e534d27565e845be71377fe778c7985fd6b1" alt="AI chat and common law. Real common law. NOT Freeman, Strawman or capital letters."
AI chat and common law. Real common law. NOT Freeman, Strawman or capital letters.
Do capital letters mean anything on documents? Was John Harris a distraction used by the UKColumn to con it's audience.
Question to AI
The English Bill of Rights 1688 has a supremacy clause. What does this mean for sovereignty issues?
AI response:
The supremacy clause in the English Bill of Rights of 1688 establishes that the law of the land, including the constitutional law, is supreme over all other forms of law, including acts of Parliament. This means that Parliament cannot make laws that are inconsistent with the constitutional principles set out in the English Bill of Rights or other fundamental constitutional documents.
Therefore, the supremacy clause reinforces the idea that constitutional law is the highest law of the land and that Parliament's powers are limited by it. It ensures that constitutional principles and rights are protected and cannot be easily changed by a simple act of Parliament. Ultimately, it establishes the sovereignty of the English constitution over the legislature, as Parliament must respect and uphold constitutional principles when making laws.
Question to AI:
The English Bill of Rights of 1688 states three times forever and once in this kingdom for all time to come, and has a non obstante clause. Can you explain what this means?
Certainly! The English Bill of Rights of 1688 is a key constitutional document in English law. It contains several provisions that were intended to limit the powers of the monarchy and protect the rights and liberties of English subjects.
The phrases "forever" and "for all time to come" used in the Bill of Rights are intended to emphasize the enduring nature of the protections it provides. Essentially, these phrases mean that the rights and liberties described in the Bill of Rights are intended to be permanently protected and cannot be easily overturned or disregarded.
The non obstante clause in the Bill of Rights means that no law or royal proclamation can override the protections provided by the Bill of Rights. This means that even if a law or proclamation contradicts the provisions of the Bill of Rights, the Bill of Rights remains in force and the law or proclamation is invalid.
Overall, the English Bill of Rights of 1688 is a foundational document in English constitutional law that provides important protections for individual rights and liberties.
-
1:19:37
The Full English Show
2 days agoAFD is the equivalent to the English Constitution Party, why? Both want out of the union.
2.41K43 -
LIVE
Flyover Conservatives
14 hours agoUkraine’s Dirty Secret: The Christian Persecution No One Wants to Talk About - Alex Newman | FOC Show
658 watching -
2:00:20
Glenn Greenwald
7 hours agoThe View from Moscow: Key Russian Analyst Aleksandr Dugin on Trump, Ukraine, Russia, and Globalism | SYSTEM UPDATE #414
46.2K14 -
1:10:55
Donald Trump Jr.
4 hours agoBREAKING NEWS: My Father Revokes Biden-Maduro Oil License, LIVE with Maria Corina Machado | Triggered Ep.220
126K144 -
1:25:29
Sarah Westall
3 hours agoX-Files True History, Project Blue Beam, Cabal Faction War w/ Former FBI Agent John DeSouza
41.4K2 -
7:03:49
Dr Disrespect
10 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - NEW PC VS. DELTA FORCE - MAX SETTINGS
129K25 -
49:04
Lights, Camera, Barstool
1 day agoIs The Monkey The Worst Movie Of The Year?? + Amazon Gets Bond
31.2K2 -
24:19
Adam Carolla
22 hours agoDiddy’s Legal Drama Escalates, Smuggler Caught Hiding WHAT? + Philly Eagles & The White House #news
49.2K6 -
10:12
Mike Rowe
2 days agoClint Hill: What A Man. What A Life. | The Way I Heard It with Mike Rowe
66.7K7 -
1:31:52
Redacted News
6 hours agoBOMBSHELL! This is war! FBI whistleblowers reveal Epstein files being destroyed? | Redacted News
144K321