Forsyth County Georgia Board of Education - Jere Krischel - 02/21/2023

As a professional, you don't talk about sex at work. You will be punished for harassment if you do. But parents are being told that if you're a professional teacher or librarian, in a K12 school, you're not just allowed to sexualize your students, you're obligated to.

The real question is - "how easy should it be for kids to get graphic sexual content?"

Here's the problem that the graphic sexual content promoters don't understand, as they giggle at people reading racy book passages, that would be prohibited in any other professional setting - in the name of sexual exploration, by a few kids that may be ready (or think they're ready) to engage with graphic sexual content, they're threatening most kids, and parents, that are not ready. Parents who are vigilant in avoiding TV, and filtering the internet at home, and putting parental controls on their kids' phones, are now faced with another challenge - monitor every book your school library.

On the other hand, parents who want to trans their kids, or expose them to pornography, or the latest woke novel written by a victim of child abuse explaining how they became queer thanks to parents that neglected them, have a much easier time. All they have to do, to allow their children the fullness of perversion and depravity that exists, is nothing. Porn will flow through the unfiltered internet, on smart phones, in adult public libraries, on the TV, with no extra effort on anyone's part.

And with all due respect to teachers who have spent years earning their degrees, and studying methods of education, or keeping up with the latest psychological trends, you do not have the right to decide that any child, other than your own, is ready for graphic sexual content. Even if you're right, and the child is perfectly ready and capable to read about deviant kink, rape, sex torture, and pedophilia, without experiencing trauma, it is not your decision, and it is not professionally acceptable.

If a teacher believes that a child must be exposed to graphic sexual content, because without presenting them graphic bestiality, or incest, or MILFs, that the child will somehow be harmed, then they need to clear it with the parents first. And if parents don't agree, after earnest attempts of persuasion, they have to honor the parents' right to decide.

Of course, some parents are a danger to their children, and this presents special problems. Just recently, prominent LGBTQ activists in Georgia, William and Zach Zulock, were caught raping their two adopted boys, from ages 6 to 11. These two predators were able to get away with grooming and sexualizing innocent children, and even prostituting them out to other pedophiles, for years. And because they wrapped themselves in the banner of diversity, inclusion, and equity, nobody caught them until google found pictures of them raping their children on the account of one of the people they sold their children as sex slaves to.

Now certainly, conservative LGTBQ couples protect their children from overt sexualization, and protest Drag Queen shows for children, and oppose sexually explicit content in school libraries, so just being LGTBQ doesn't mean you're endangering children.

But if you're so hell bent, on making it easier for children to access sexual content, without first recognizing the rights of parents, not only are you being unprofessional, you're adding to the danger.

And so on that note, thank you very much for your time, and again, I'd love to have lunch with anyone who disagrees with me.