Premium Only Content
![BREAKING - US officials told Kyiv’s representatives that it doesn’t have any Army](https://1a-1791.com/video/fw/s8/1/8/z/j/k/8zjki.qR4e-small-BREAKING-US-officials-told-.jpg)
BREAKING - US officials told Kyiv’s representatives that it doesn’t have any Army
The Biden administration has given its Ukrainian counterparts another reason for not sending them much-wanted long-range missiles: The U.S. is concerned it wouldn’t have enough for itself.
In recent meetings at the Pentagon, U.S. officials told Kyiv’s representatives that it doesn’t have any Army Tactical Missile Systems to spare, according to four people with knowledge of the talks. Transferring ATACMS to the battlefield in eastern Europe would dwindle America’s stockpiles and harm the U.S. military’s readiness for a future fight, the people said.
That worry, along with the administration’s existing concern that Ukraine would use the 190-mile range missiles to attack deep inside Russian territory and cross what the Kremlin has said is a red line, is why the U.S. isn’t shipping ATACMS to the frontlines any time soon.
The Pentagon’s assessment of its stockpiles is informed in part by how many weapons and munitions planners think they might need to confront an enemy. Those plans have not been significantly revised since the start of the war in Ukraine, and have not recalibrated what the stockpiles the U.S. might need in reserve to face a weakened Russia, or account for the fact that Ukraine is essentially fighting that war right now.
One of the reasons the military is hesitant to send the ATACMS is due to a desire to maintain a certain level of munitions in U.S. stockpiles, said one U.S. official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military calculations.
“With any package, we always consider our readiness and our own stocks while providing Ukraine what it needs on the battlefield,” said a senior DoD official. “There are other ways of providing Ukraine with the capabilities it needs to strike the targets.”
Laura Cooper, the Pentagon’s top policy official for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia issues, said in a recent interview that “with every single capability that we provide, whether you’re talking, you know, HIMARS or you’re talking a particular kind of missile or ammunition, we’re always looking at the availability of our stocks, we’re looking at production considerations, and so that’s true of every capability, and we make decisions accordingly.”
-
35:22
DiggTrueInfor17
1 year agoNEW-Col Doug Macgregor: Neocons Globalist they will do everything to harm Russia
424 -
2:04:52
Kim Iversen
11 hours agoElon's Pumping Out Babies Like They're Tesla Model 3's | EU Panics Over Peace Talks, Wants More War
140K127 -
1:05:35
Man in America
13 hours agoFort Knox & Trump’s Secret Gold Move—The Financial Reset NO ONE Is Ready For?
87.2K45 -
2:21:20
Robert Gouveia
10 hours agoTrump Goes to SCOTUS! Judge CAVES on DOGE? Fani Willis Not Happy!
108K30 -
20:41
Stephen Gardner
10 hours ago🔥You Won't BELIEVE What JUST Happened To Don Trump Jr.!!
112K191 -
58:00
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
8 hours agoEuropean Leaders Resist Trump Peace Overtures To Their Own Demise | The StoneZONE w/ Roger Stone
77.6K12 -
9:29
AlaskanBallistics
10 hours ago $8.77 earnedWyoming Suppressors and Rifles at Shot Show 2025
90.5K4 -
1:06:40
Donald Trump Jr.
14 hours agoThe Left is Taking one L After Another, Live with Michael Knowles | Triggered Ep. 217
181K116 -
47:17
Kimberly Guilfoyle
14 hours agoWoke Gets DOGE’d, Live with AJ Rice & Jarrett Stepman | Ep. 197
133K43 -
20:11
Candace Show Podcast
12 hours agoBecoming Brigitte: Candace Owens x Xavier Poussard | Ep 6
200K332