Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c64aa/c64aadfae68f494ad1b20fe8b51c43b736287e17" alt="ACLJ Just Filed 2 Major Lawsuits"
ACLJ Just Filed 2 Major Lawsuits
Earlier this week, we told you how the ACLJ had filed a lawsuit against the Smithsonian after its employees targeted and harassed a group of pro-life students, teachers, and parents when they tried to visit the National Air and Space Museum.
Now we’ve just filed a new lawsuit against the National Archives for the same discrimination against pro-lifers – on the same day. If the radical Left thinks it can weaponize taxpayer-supported institutions to target pro-lifers, it’s in for a rude awakening from the ACLJ. In this particular incident, our four clients, including a woman and her daughter, were told to remove their pro-life shirts if they wanted to enter. It’s infuriating.
And now we have the strength of 40 Members of Congress taking up the case to defend pro-life citizens from being targeted. An official letter signed by 40 U.S. Senators and Representatives was just sent to Smithsonian Institute officials demanding an explanation for why it allowed employees to abuse and kick out pro-life visitors because of their hats. And the letter cited the work of the ACLJ to bring this offense to their attention:
"According to the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), 'Once in the museum, [the students] were accosted several times and told they would be forced to leave unless they removed their pro-life hats. The group all wore the same blue hat that simply said, ‘Rosary PRO-LIFE.’ Other individuals in the museum were wearing hats of all kinds without issue' and 'The museum staff mocked the students, called them expletives, and made comments that the museum was a ‘neutral zone’ where they could not express such statements.'
As Members of Congress, we are unaware of any laws, rules, or regulations prohibiting members of the public from wearing pro-life hats inside Smithsonian office buildings. Furthermore, there is a large body of jurisprudence reinforcing citizens’ First Amendment rights on public property. As a federal entity and the recipient of more than $1 billion in federal funds every year, there should be no debate as to whether the First Amendment applies to the Smithsonian. We are deeply concerned about this unjust expulsion of young Americans from museums—subsidized with taxpayer dollars—for wearing apparel that your staff disagreed with."
It’s gratifying to see Congress standing up for pro-life Americans as we head into court to defend them.
Today’s full Sekulow broadcast includes more details about our two major lawsuits to defend pro-life Americans, including students, from being targeted and harassed, as well as more discussion with Sec. Mike Pompeo.
-
8:09
American Center for Law and Justice
2 days agoDOGE Scores a Victory in Legal Battle
5.62K7 -
8:43
Film Threat
1 day agoTHE MONKEY | Film Threat Reviews
64.5K2 -
15:55
TSPLY
1 day agoThe Media Is Very Afraid Of FBI Director Kash Patel
47.2K40 -
6:57
Cooking with Gruel
22 hours agoMake Cheese Great Again
37.5K12 -
5:17
Mrgunsngear
1 day ago $7.62 earnedPresident Trump Has Appointed A New ATF Director
42.8K37 -
48:17
Athlete & Artist Show
8 days ago $3.18 earnedS5E1: Chucky Announces First Kid, 4 Nations Face Off, and more!
54.2K3 -
38:30
hickok45
10 hours agoSunday Shoot-a-Round # 269
72.1K18 -
1:39:55
Squaring The Circle, A Randall Carlson Podcast
1 day ago#040 Humanity's Expansion Into The Cosmos: A New Age - Squaring The Circle
41.8K6 -
12:54
ariellescarcella
20 hours agoYou're NOT Queer, Just Annoying And Boring
29.3K21 -
18:57
Fit'n Fire
16 hours ago $1.57 earnedA PDW That Thumps -- Stribog SP45A3 45ACP
28.5K2