Prince Harry accused of war crimes by Taliban after saying he killed 25 fighters in Afghanistan

Taliban warlord Anas Haqqani said Sovereign Harry was inappropriate to portray extremists as 'chess pieces'

Ruler Harry at a perception post in Helmand area, southern Afghanistan

Ruler Harry has been blamed for carrying out atrocities by the Taliban.

The charge was made by a Taliban warlord after Harry said he killed 25 warriors in Afghanistan.

In his new diary, Spare, Harry talked about foe extremists he killed during six battle missions.

He admitted to thinking about those he killed not "as individuals" however as "chess pieces" to be taken out from the board, the Mirror reports.

However his remarks have drawn analysis from the Taliban,

who he was battling during his experience on the Helman cutting edges as an Apache helicopter co-pilot and heavy armament specialist.

Taliban warlord Anas Haqqani said on Twitter: "Mr Harry! The ones you killed were not chess pieces, they were people

; they had families who were sitting tight for their return. Among the enemies of Afghans

, very few have your fairness to uncover their still, small voice and admit to their atrocities."

Another Taliban officer, Molavi Agha Gol, 32, said Harry "needs a specialist"

also, said his diary is about consideration chasing.

The "Mujaheddin" rule successful, Gol demanded. The authority told the MailOnline:

"We are still here administering yet he has escaped to his grandma's castle. He's a motor mouth failure who has been attempting to certainly stand out enough to be noticed.
Sovereign Harry at a perception post in Helmand territory, southern Afghanistan

"I don't for even a moment accept the thing he said about the Mujaheddin. He is a washout and frightened to go to a battle zone. We impacted the world forever by removing him and his military from our country and he ought to be exceptionally furious about that.

"Try not to accept anything failures tell you. I see news about him a great deal on my Facebook channel and truly believe he's gone frantic and needs a specialist right away."

The administrator likewise dismissed the sovereign's case about the quantity of individuals he killed. Furthermore, he said Harry's officer companions will be
Consuming in damnation.

He finished up by going after the Duke of Sussex's manliness. He provoked him by saying he isn't man to the point of getting back to Afghanistan.

The sovereign had said the killings were not something he was 'embarrassed about.

"It was not something that filled me with fulfillment, but rather I was not embarrassed possibly," he said.
Harry reprimanded by senior ex-military voices in the UK

In any case, an ex-top military official said Harry's remarks were "not well judged".
He cautioned they could prompt assaults on English officers abroad.

Colonel Richard Kemp, who directed the English powers in Afghanistan in 2003

, said claims English warriors see their foe as subhuman were pointless.
Ruler Harry itemized the quantity of Taliban contenders he had killed while serving in Afghanistan in his new book Spare

He said Harry's comments "were likely not well decided for two reasons. One is his idea that he killed 25 individuals will have reincited those individuals who wish him hurt."

The colonel told Sky News Harry had falsley "described" the English Armed force as preparing him to consider the adversary as not exactly human

. He said that the remarks really might transform Harry into to a greater extent an objective.
The colonel likewise figures the journal will harm Harry's standing and the general's assessment of the military. He said that normally,

previous servicemen would just talk about the number of individuals they that have killed "secretly" or "with their own friends".

Because of a significant number of killings occurring in current battle at long reach with drones or other military gear,

many troopers won't know the number of they that have killed. Harry's position implies it is conceivable he might approach much more data, the colonel said.

Previous public safety consultant Master Darroch said: "as far as the detail I for one could never have gone there, yet it's done at this point.

" Harry has been blamed for breaking no less than four military codes.

Significant General Chip Chapman said Harry and his professional writer were

"uncouthly and innocently idiotic". "For his purposes, who needs protection and security

, he's simply freed himself up to each jihadist and psycho out there," he told Times Radio.
Chapman said Harry's case of 25 kills as "somewhat crazy".

Since the Sovereign was an Apache pilot working some distance away, Chapman says it is basically impossible that he could ID or cover anybody.

"It's a dreadful absence of judgment and development," he said. "It's a credulous way to deal with how the military would act.

What's more, we discuss jus in bello lead in war. This is a horrible lead in harmony."