The Case That Could Stop ATF's Overreach on Pistol Braces

2 years ago
60

Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: https://masterworks.art/washingtongunlaw Purchase shares in masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. How Masterworks works: - Create your account with your traditional bank account - Pick major works of art to invest in or our new blue-chip diversified art portfolio - Invest, hold shares in works or trade them in our secondary marketplace See important Masterworks disclosures: https://www.masterworks.io/about/disc...
_______________________________________________________________________
Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the all important case of Second Amendment Foundation v. A.T.F., filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of Texas (Ft. Worth). This suit, brought many months ago, is in response to ATF's proposed new rules on pistols with attached stabilizing braces. This suit aims to overturn ATF's gross encroachment into Article 1 functions in order to violate Americans' Constitutional Rights. However, this suit was brought before the United States Supreme Court had issued its rulings in both New York Pistol & Rifle Assoc. v. Bruen and West Virginia v. EPA. What will the amended pleadings look like? How much better has the plaintiff's arguments gotten with recent case law? Learn all of this and arm yourself with education today.
______________________________________________________________________
Time and time again, the Second Amendment Foundation gets into the trench and fights for your rights. If you want to support the Second Amendment Foundation, visit them at: https://www.saf.org/

In addition, the fine folks at Rainier Arms, have once again stuck their neck out to fight for the individual rights of every Washington resident. If you want to show them some love, visit Rainier Arms at. https://www.rainierarms.com/ or on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/Rainierarms/
____________________________________________________________________
Applicable Cases:

Second Amendment Foundation v. ATF (Complaint of Plaintiff). https://www.saf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Complaint.pdf

New York Pistol and Rifle Association v. Bruen. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

West Virginia v. EPA. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1530_n758.pdf
________________________________________________________________________
Applicable Rule(s):

ATF Final Rule 2021(R)-08. Now repealed awaiting republication. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/10/2021-12176/factoring-criteria-for-firearms-with-attached-stabilizing-braces
_______________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

All The Terrible Choices ATF Will Leave You With For Your Pistol Braces. https://youtu.be/7-YtAOlwc7k

Will Removing Your Pistol Brace Make Any Difference with the ATF? https://youtu.be/1KfcnuvDTsE

How the ATF Will Set Their Amnesty Registration Trap. https://youtu.be/zLpixM2M5lc

Is Pistol Brace Amnesty About to Become the Biggest Trap Ever Set? https://youtu.be/dGEK8FXSBwc

Check Out our Bullet Point Series. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTYlAL5t-3aPwsSwmze-Dw_ev5b7PgNpe
__________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington

Loading comments...