Premium Only Content
How to Stop The Joe Biden Crime Family
Please Follow David Jose on Twitter. https://twitter.com/RealDaveCares4u
Natural law refers to laws of morality ascertainable through human reason. Moral philosophers have posited that such laws are antecedent and independent of positive, man-made law. The understanding of natural law is varied and complex, dependent upon the role morality plays in determining the authority of legal norms and rules. The relationship between natural law and the First Amendment is equally complex. In general, natural law, as a “higher” law, forms the foundation on which the First Amendment rests.
Natural law is the foundation for legal traditions
As a legal philosophy, natural law forms the basis and foundations for legal traditions. As a term of politics and jurisprudence, natural law is a body of rules prescribed by an authority superior to that of the state. It is intended to protect individual rights from infringement by other individuals, nation-states, or political orders.
Natural law as a protection of social practices and norms applies not only to states and governments but also to individuals. It provides an ethical set of rules for governing individuals in their interactions with one another based on the idea that positive, or man-made, laws are merely the articulation of the preexisting norms, social practices, and ideas held under natural law. Although natural law provides guidance for individuals in their pursuits and relationships, it does not lead to universal agreement. Moreover, humans do not always act on the basis of rational and deductive thought.
Aquinas concluded that man-made law is only valid if it conforms to natural law
The medieval philosopher Thomas Aquinas was among those who concluded that a man-made law is valid only insofar as its content conforms to the content of the natural law. An unjust law is therefore not really a law. This gives individuals who believe that laws are unjust a way to oppose them. Religious beliefs have long been cited as justification for disobeying laws. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. invoked natural law in opposing racial segregation.
Locke believed if a ruler goes against natural law, the state can be overthrown
Theorists such as the English philosopher John Locke believed that if a ruler goes against natural law and fails to protect “life, liberty, and property,” then the people are justified in overthrowing the existing state. Locke and his successors often referred to “natural rights” rather than to “natural law” — thus somewhat secularizing the earlier concept, albeit while still acknowledging a Creator. Thomas Jefferson articulated this philosophy in the Declaration of Independence when he declared that “all men are created equal” and that “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,” among which he included those of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
Madison believed the state could not meddle in an individual's relationship to God
James Madison believed that the individual’s relationship to God existed prior even to his or her entry into society; individuals were directly responsible to God, and the state had no authority to meddle in this relationship. The right to the free exercise of religion would be furthered by maintaining the separation of church and state. At the same time, the government had no right to suppress the right of expression to which religious and political freedom were linked.
-
1:42:21
The Quartering
14 hours agoTrump To INVADE Mexico, Take Back Panama Canal Too! NYC Human Torch & Matt Gaetz Report Drops!
143K101 -
2:23:15
Nerdrotic
13 hours ago $12.44 earnedA Very Merry Christmas | FNT Square Up - Nerdrotic Nooner 453
110K11 -
1:14:05
Tucker Carlson
13 hours ago“I’ll Win With or Without You,” Teamsters Union President Reveals Kamala Harris’s Famous Last Words
204K367 -
1:58:31
The Dilley Show
13 hours ago $34.00 earnedTrump Conquering Western Hemisphere? w/Author Brenden Dilley 12/23/2024
154K42 -
1:09:59
Geeks + Gamers
14 hours agoSonic 3 DESTROYS Mufasa And Disney, Naughty Dog Actress SLAMS Gamers Over Intergalactic
105K21 -
51:59
The Dan Bongino Show
15 hours agoDemocrat Donor Admits The Scary Truth (Ep. 2393) - 12/23/2024
904K3.04K -
2:32:15
Matt Kohrs
1 day agoRumble CEO Chris Pavlovski Talks $775M Tether Partnership || The MK Show
137K34 -
28:23
Dave Portnoy
1 day agoDavey Day Trader Presented by Kraken - December 23, 2024
168K44 -
59:29
BonginoReport
17 hours agoTrump, Murder Plots, and the Christmas Miracle: Evita + Jack Posobiec (Ep.110) - 12/23/2024
171K150 -
2:59:14
Wendy Bell Radio
20 hours agoNothing To See Here
135K80