Democrats' 4,000 page omnibus bill is an 'abomination

LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. https://www.youtube.com/c/BaldBrad

In this clip from The Bald Brad Show, critics are howling at spending perks and rules littered throughout the $1.7 trillion “omnibus” bill meant to fund the federal government for another fiscal year.

The legislation was unveiled in the Senate early Tuesday and boasts $858 billion in defense funding as well as $772.5 billion for non-defense “discretionary programs,” according to a summary. Time is of the essence as funding expires Friday at midnight, leaving some lawmakers to grumble while poring over the legislation that is more than 4,000 pages long.

Rep. Dan Bishop (R-NC) shared a Twitter thread on what he dubbed “some of the most egregious provisions in the bill.” First on his list was a section outlining requirements of more than $1.5 million geared toward “border management requirements” for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, including a ban on using those funds “to acquire, maintain, or extend border security technology and capabilities, except for technology and capabilities to improve Border Patrol processing.”

Watch the full episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuFbEANlDuY

#democrats #news #politics

FOLLOW ME:
Podcast: https://thebaldbradshow.podbean.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/BaldBrad
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bald.brad/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@bald_brad?lan
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/BaldBrad
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/TheBaldBrad

Business Inquiries: TheBaldBradShow@gmail.com

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.