DaamnTalk - Dr J Peterson & author Iain McGilchrist - The master & emissary - (but then we broke up)

#DaamnTalk & DaamnTalkDJO (DontJustObey): An episodic series of interviews featuring the unique viewpoints, established perspectives & unpopular opinions of (extra)ordinarily Americans such as You. Message today! Found experimentally wherever social media is, experientially a community on 'Locals'.com , a blog on 'ThinkSpot' & centralized at daamntalk.com (where the following excerpt, (mission statement), can be found in it's entirety accompanied by the ' DT CommStan's ' and contact info to virtually feature on an episode! (Hosted by DaamnKam)
*Full episodes & all interviews available for members only on Locals.com
Our point is this; to have these discussions is to allow the potential for ones viewpoints & values to be threatened... To not have the discussion is to allow the dismissal of an idea to proceed it's presentation, (to abandon any inherent discussion)! That amount of power is a far more threatening prospect! Social media's become so culturally & politically influential, we've faced a MAJOR decision; (On three levels) *as private citizens, to agree to 'terms of service', *as a people, (*group of consumers) to negotiate what 'terms of service' are 'fair' and finally, as a *governing body. I'd make the argument that the second decision was made despite a discussion never properly happening & now that it looks like FB isn't going anywhere (despite a swarm of lawsuits & investigations into criminal activity dating back to when they unlawfully ran their competitors out of business), we're all 'profiles' 'trapped' in a 'non-negotiable agreement'.
Consequences of this have already wrecked havoc on 'accounts' (people) of all types & as a collective we've handed over virtually unlimited access to all of our personal information. The third and final decision is one that's still in the making; exactly what role does the federal government play(?) This is why it is of the upmost importance NOW that we get the discussion going before the decisions are made! Some of those same people we've chosen to represent us would rather dismiss us on grounds our proposed 'converse session' is too 'controversial'. This is a way of keeping us in the dark without having to openly address the margin for error & invitation to corruption that's definitively probable when any one private organization has as much power as the federal government.
- Please, leave your thoughts below & check us out on Locals.com/daamntalk AND on Thinkspot.com/thatDaamnTalkshow for the ThatDaamnThinkSpot community.