Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
LIVE
Tundra Gaming Live
6 hours agoThe Worlds Okayest War Thunder Stream//FORMER F-16 MAINTAINER//77th FS//#rumblefam
272 watching -
LIVE
DemolitionDx
1 hour agoSunday night COD with friends.
457 watching -
2:10:14
vivafrei
12 hours agoEp. 237: More Trump Cabinet Picks! MAHA or Slap in the Face? Canada on Fire! Go Woke Go Broke & MORE
132K177 -
LIVE
SOLTEKGG
2 hours ago $1.63 earned🟢 First Day on RUMBLE!
235 watching -
LIVE
Vigilant News Network
6 hours agoCOVID-Vaccinated Hit With Grave New Reality | Media Blackout
2,543 watching -
1:26:31
Josh Pate's College Football Show
5 hours ago $1.44 earnedSEC Disaster Saturday | Major CFP Earthquake Coming | Officiating Is A Disaster | New Studio Debut
9.87K -
1:43:05
Adam Does Movies
9 hours ago $2.79 earnedGladiator II Spoiler Conversation With Hack The Movies
14.3K -
24:10
Bwian
9 hours agoI Don't Know What I'm Doing in Fortnite, But I Still Won...
11.4K1 -
19:30
DeVory Darkins
11 hours ago $37.52 earnedJoe Rogan MOCKS The View as Bill Maher HUMILIATES Woke Scientist
85.8K122 -
11:25:41
Scottish Viking Gaming
12 hours agoSUNDAY FUNDAY | Jump into my Sons of the Forest Game | DOO EET NOWWA!
86.8K1