Premium Only Content

Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
32:56
Uncommon Sense In Current Times
15 hours ago $1.00 earnedCompromised Christian Leaders Are Failing America | Stockholm Syndrome Christianity | Dr. John West
9.38K9 -
56:44
State of the Second Podcast
17 hours agoSelf-Defense Myths That Will Get You Locked Up (ft. Armed Attorneys)
2.54K1 -
8:35
RTT: Guns & Gear
16 hours ago $0.26 earnedUltimate Custom Glock 19 Slide You Need to See | Stiffler Manufacturing
3.4K1 -
7:23
BIG NEM
11 hours agoHow I Befriended a Black Supremacist Over Salad
3.23K6 -
1:41:13
The Confessionals
19 hours agoThis Species Is Replicating Through Human Wombs…and No One’s Noticing
19.5K61 -
1:42:33
The Criminal Connection Podcast
19 hours ago $4.51 earnedNICK MORAN Lock Stock SECRETS, Punching Paparazzi & Living with Jason Statham (Honest SNATCH Review)
24.3K2 -
12:38
The Gun Collective
16 hours agoWOW! New Guns that JUST came out!
22.9K3 -
59:21
Trumpet Daily
20 hours ago $8.51 earnedJCPOA 2.0 - Trumpet Daily | Apr. 15, 2025
29.7K11 -
24:56
The Brett Cooper Show
1 day ago $9.00 earnedWhat Hollywood Can Learn From the Minecraft Movie | Episode 22
44.1K52 -
18:23
Michael Franzese
17 hours agoTom Hardy Is Back — And He’s Absolutely Ruthless | Mobland Review
71.7K8