Premium Only Content
Federal judge issues restraining order
YouTube = https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGobVm8zABdoMmv8Fbc1wMg
Locals = https://sweethomesa.locals.com/
POPULIST REVOLT = https://populistrevolt.com
A federal judge in Phoenix issued a restraining order Tuesday (11/1) night against a group that has been photographing and recording voters casting ballots at drop boxes in Arizona.
The order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Michael Liburdi prohibits Clean Elections USA from "openly" carrying weapons or "visibly wear body armor" within 250 feet of a drop box. Liburdi's order also bars the group's members from taking photos, recording, following or yelling at voters within 75 feet of drop box locations.
Further, he told the group's founder, Melody Jennings, to post a message to her account on Truth Social, former President Donald Trump's social media platform, that reads in part: “It is not always illegal to deposit multiple ballots in a ballot drop box. It is legal to deposit the ballot of a family member, household member, or person for whom you are the caregiver."
The group and its founder were accused of “intimidation and harassment”of voters as they dropped off their ballots in Maricopa County. The lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino.
The restraining order comes after a series of warnings about potential voter intimidation in the battleground state.
Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who is running for governor, said last week that her office had referred six reports of possible voter intimidation to the state attorney general’s office and the U.S. Justice Department for further investigation, after receiving “several complaints” from voters reporting that they were recorded and that their license plates were photographed as they dropped off ballots.
Liburdi's order comes after his refusal on Friday to grant the restraining order requested by Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans and Voto Latino. He said at the time that “while this case certainly presents serious questions, the Court cannot craft an injunction without violating the First Amendment.”
“Plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any evidence that Defendants’ conduct constitutes a true threat,” Liburdi wrote last week.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
-
59:02
Russell Brand
3 hours agoIs Free Speech Under Threat? Australia’s U16 Social Media Ban, & Maddow vs Jay Bhattacharya – SF501
98.4K175 -
LIVE
The New American
1 hour agoIncoming Border Czar Tom Homan Threatens Dem Leaders With Loss of Federal Money | New American Daily
771 watching -
LIVE
GameLeap RAID Shadow Legends
1 hour ago $0.78 earnedSOULSTONE PULLS, Building He-Man, F2P Account Update! - Raid Shadow Legends
268 watching -
1:57:44
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoTrump's Tariff Brilliance + Crushing Lawfare Forever | Sen. Moreno, Habba, O'Keefe | 11.26.24
109K37 -
44:35
TheAlecLaceShow
2 hours agoTrump Threatens Tariffs on Mexico & Canada | Jack Smith Drops Charges | WW3 | The Alec Lace Show
24.7K4 -
6:57
Rethinking the Dollar
17 hours agoCommodities Boom Incoming: Why Gold and Silver Are Leading the Charge
15.4K3 -
4:15:07
Sgtfinesse
3 hours agoSarge's 1st Stream on Rumble
32.1K1 -
58:23
The Dan Bongino Show
5 hours agoDemocrats Enter Full Panic Mode (Ep. 2378) - 11/26/2024
667K1.71K -
58:04
The Rubin Report
4 hours agoCNN Host Gets Visibly Angry as Her Trap for Conservative Backfires in Her Face
62.2K64 -
1:28:35
Benny Johnson
4 hours ago🚨VICTORY: All Charges Against Trump DROPPED, Time For REVENGE | Mexico, Canada Bend Knee To Trump
80.7K89