GMO Tuesday...Food Processing and Your Blood

Who is processing our food? Where does your blood go when you donate blood? Why are we being lied to about everything concerning our health and the food supply???
https://usafirstreporting.com/cdc-big-pharma-companies-caught-in-potentially-major-conflict-of-interest/

https://icbe-emf.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ICBE-EMF-paper-12940_2022_900_OnlinePDF_Patched-1.pdf

In the late-1990s, the FCC and ICNIRP adopted radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits to protect the public and workers from adverse effects of RFR. These limits were based on results from behavioral studies conducted in the 1980s involving 40–60-minute exposures in 5 monkeys and 8 rats, and then applying arbitrary safety factors to an apparent threshold specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4W/kg. The limits were also based on two major assumptions: any biological effects were due to excessive tissue heating and no effects would occur below the putative threshold SAR, as well as twelve assumptions that were not specified by either the FCC or ICNIRP. In this paper, we show how the past 25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC’s and ICNIRP’s exposure limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm. Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Also, multiple human studies have found statistically significant associations between RFR exposure and increased brain and thyroid cancer risk. Yet, in 2020, and in light of the body of evidence reviewed in this article, the FCC and ICNIRP reaffirmed the same limits that were established in the 1990s. Consequently, these exposure limits, which are based on false suppositions, do not adequately protect workers, children, hypersensitive individuals, and the general population from short-term or long-term RFR exposures. Thus, urgently needed are health protective exposure limits for humans and the environment. These limits must be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions, especially given the increasing worldwide exposures of people and the environment to RFR, including novel forms of radiation from 5G telecommunications for which there are no adequate health effects studies.

FAIR USE STATEMENT: According to the “Fair Use” clause of International Copyright Law, the author declares that thaaswwwwqqqwerte use of photos, images, lyrics, video, or any other information in all academic/reference/scholarly works we do is for the purpose of “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research” according to Section 107. – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use, U.S. Copyright Code. We believe that our not-for-profit research and educational use constitutes a fair use of any copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.) United States Code: Title 17, Section 107FAIR USE NOTICE: Video may contain some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that our not-for-profit educational use constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this is distributed without profit with the included information for research and educational purposes.

As with all Independent Journalist folks we can use a helping hand. If you can make a contribution to assist in keeping the lights on please go to my website and use the donate feature in the right sidebar. Thank you
https://paypal.me/aaronaveiro1?locale.x=en_US
Please visit our website and let us know what you think. You may also use the paypal features for donations or other inquiries. https://aladaymobilemedia.com