Funeral Directors & Embalmers Unite to Expose A Day in the Death of Life

Funeral directors and embalmers John O'Looney (UK), Richard Hirschman (US) and Brenton Faithfull (NZ) interviewed by Counter Spin Media.

Lots of links to related video's here: https://counterspinmedia.com/blog/resources-videos/episode-74-funeral-directors-embalmers-unite/

SUBJECTS DISCUSSED AND NOTES

NB: I made these notes from memory about an hour after watching the whole interview. The notes are more or less in chronological order.

- Deaths which are clearly not COVID related, e.g. gunshot or an elderly person who died in fetal position (which means Alzheimer), are labeled as COVID deaths.

- Inhumane treatment of the dead and their loved ones, who were refused proper burial rituals due to infection prevention measures of mass destruction in the beginning of the 'pandemic'.

- Presence of never before seen calamari clots since vaxx roll-out. The clots consist mainly of misfolded amyloid proteins that are supposed to be broken down by the body, but aren't. The clots tend to keep growing.

- Is it legal and ethical to take samples, e.g. the calamari clots, from the dead? Yes. Although the organs must remain with the body, clots would normally have been thrown away, so there is no harm in analyzing them. Regardless, the responsibility to the living takes precedence of the responsibility to the dead. Even if it were to become illegal to analyze the clots and speak out, these laws are wrong, so should not be obeyed.

"Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless or corrupt. And a citizen who barters with such a state shares in its corruption and lawlessness." ― Mahatma Gandhi

- Some people seem to be deliberately murdered with death protocols consisting of for example remdesivir and lethal doses of (the sedative) midazolam.

- Little to no excess mortality before vaxx roll-out followed sharp rise in excess mortality after roll-out.

- Coroners and pathologists are willfully blind. They may acknowledge the calamari clots, but claim that these have developed after death, which is absolutely untrue. The clots have been proven to occur in the living. Coroners and pathologists are not recognizing that the clots and others damages are vaxx induced, because they're not employing stains for spike proteins.

If their attention is pointed to inconvenient facts, they look away. If they're asked 'dangerous' questions, they refuse to answer, so there will be no paper trail of them knowing anything and FOIA requests will not show anything. They even receive training to stay quiet. More and more coroners are refusing to do autopsies of possible vaccine deaths.

- Pre/peri/post-natal deaths seem to have increased. However, changes in deaths of babies are difficult to ascertain for the people in this interview, since the bodies of these babies are taken care of by the government, not by regular funeral services. Information of these deaths only reaches the latter through the grapevine.

- There seems to be an increase in the deaths of children and young adults since the jab roll-out.

- Turbo cancer. People who died of cancer used to die relatively slowly and tended to be bald and emaciated after their death. Now, more and more people who died of cancer, (1) die within a very short timespan after symptom onset and diagnosis, (2) don't look like cancer deaths at all, since they still have all their hair and are not emaciated. If you were not informed that they died of cancer, you wouldn't have known.

- Employees don't think, but profess to strictly follow the protocols and guidelines: An order is an order. "Don't think and refuse to consider and answer heretical questions; just do as you're told. Thou shalt obey."

- When, not if, the population finally wakes up, they will be livid and may turn on those who pushed the jabs and were involved in promoting, advising and administering the jabs. The bravest (wisest?) people are not those in this interview, but those who were publicly pro-COVID vaxx at first, and have now done a public U-turn. (Recent example: dr. Aseem Malhotra.) Not only will their jobs be at risk, but they may be the most exposed to catch the ire of the public and colleagues.

Those who remain willfully blind and quiet are not brave, but stupid and have blood on their hands. They could have prevented countless severe injuries and deaths, but didn't. Doing nothing and staying quiet is also a choice and makes you complicit in the harm caused.