The Raw Deal (23 September 2022) with John Remington Graham

My guest today is a retired professor of law who has served as prosecutor and defense attorney at various stages of his career. He knows quite a lot about my Sandy Hook case, which, like the other lawsuits involving Sandy Hook, was not decided by a jury trial but rather on procedural or other grounds, where the death of 20 children and 6 adults at the place on 14 December 2012 has never been addressed by a jury. Other cases have been decided on the basis of stipulations or assumptions or, in the case of Alex Jones, by default for failing to satisfy discovery in a timely fashion. Mine was decided using an odd summary judgment procedure that allowed the judge (on the basis of his own subjective opinion) to decide whether or not facts were "reasonable" and, if not, to exclude them from further consideration. So the evidence I submitted was found to be "unreasonable" and treated as though it did not exist, even including the reports of 2 forensic document experts. Jack opined that my case before the US Supreme Court is important by virtue of proposing that the court (in effect) incorporate the 7th Amendment within the 14th, whidh, due to historical circumstances, has been done for the other 9 of the first 10 amendments but not for the 7th. The audio was not good, alas, and Jack had to leave at the top of the second hour.