Be Kind. Be Considerate. Practice The Golden Rule. Sincerely Seek The Truth.

We are beset by controversies, differing perspectives, and angry disagreements on all sides. A recent post from Dr. Robert Malone illustrates some of the ugliness that is sweeping the status-quo-challenging COVID-19 world:

More Fever Swamp
By Dr. Robert Malone
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/more-fever-swamp

What is the antidote to the angry, confusing messes we find ourselves in today?

Be kind. Be considerate. Practice The Golden Rule.

Near-Death Experience - Kenneth Ring - The Golden Rule Dramatically Illustrated
https://rumble.com/vm023m-near-death-experience-kenneth-ring-the-golden-rule-dramatically-illustrated.html

Also make a sincere, sustained, open-minded effort to seek the truth -- the real truth -- in all situations:

What Is The Truth Of The Matter?

https://www.sunfellow.com/quotes-from-the-pathwork-lectures-of-eva-pierrakos/

“The more the man strives to prove his friend wrong, the more friction is created. He believes that by proving himself right and the friend wrong, the friend will finally accept and love him again and all will be well. When this does not occur, he misinterprets it and tries harder; he thinks he has not sufficiently proven that he is right and the other wrong. The rift widens and his anxiety increases. The more weapons he uses in his effort to win the fight, the deeper into difficulty he gets, until he actually damages himself and the other and acts against his own best interest. He is now faced with a further conflict which has arisen out of the first error and dualistic split. In order to avoid a total rift, with all its real and imagined dangers–for real damage has begun to be wrought–he is now faced with the alternatives of having to give in to appease and avoid damage to himself, or to continue fighting. Since he is still convinced that there is a right and a wrong, appeasement robs him of self-respect. Whether he uses this ‘solution’ or not, he will be torn between the two alternatives: fighting or submitting. Both create tension, anxiety, and inner and outer disadvantages.

“The act which appears to be the most difficult for a man to perform but which, in reality, is the easiest and most unstrained act possible, is to ask, ‘What is the truth of the matter?’ The moment an individual is more bent on the truth than on proving that he is right, he contacts the Divine principle or transcendent, unified truth. If the desire to be in truth is genuine, inspiration must come forth. No matter how much circumstances seem to point in one direction, man must be willing to relinquish and question that what he sees is all there is to the issue. This generous act of integrity opens the way to the Real Self. This act will be easier to perform when man contemplates that it is not necessarily a question of either/or, but that there may be aspects of right in the other and of wrong in himself that, so far, he has not seen because his attention was not directed to this eventuality.

“With this approach to a problem, man immediately opens the way to enter into the unified plane of existence and to be moved by the Real Self. This immediately releases an energy which is distinctly felt when this act is committed in a deep, and sincere way. It also brings release of tension. What he then finds out is always totally different from both what he hoped for and feared on the dualistic plane. He finds that he is not as right and innocent as he thought, nor as wrong as he feared, nor is the opponent. He soon discovers aspects in the matter that he never saw before, although they were not necessarily concealed. He understands exactly how the quarrel came into existence in the first place, what led to it, its history before its actual manifestation. With this he gains insight into the nature of the relationship, he learns about himself and the other and he increases his understanding of the laws of communication. The more vision he thus gains, the freer, stronger, and more secure he feels.”

— Pathwork Guide Lecture 143