Premium Only Content
Interest Of Justice 90 Second Video To The WHO/INB Pandemic Treaty, September 9, 2022
Interest Of Justice 90 second video to the WHO/INB on the "New international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response: contributing to the second round of public hearings at the WHO/INB"
Here is the question from the WHO/INB in which IOJ is responding:
"Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”
90 second video transcript by IOJ:
"Interest of Justice experience in the declared COVID-19 pandemic was a loss of health from unnecessary limitations on rights not strictly required by the exigencies of the situation
Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, but were not utilized in order to declare the pandemic.
The treaty is intended to re-define pandemic, despite the word being already defined in customary law.
The WHO concedes that a pandemic cannot be controlled, therefore, If the WHO were to try to better prevent future pandemics they would not only be going against the unequivocal rules of science, they would be going against their previous COVID-19 declaration of pandemic where the WHO confessed that a pandemic cannot be controlled.
To protect health in the future there should be no centralized international level healthcare system and blanket measures are presumed disproportionate on their face.
To respect the sovereignty of each country as well as meet the who’s obligations to the IHR article 3 section 4, The control and management of pandemics should be left to each individual nation to handle in the way that their sovereign legislators intended in their own regulations.
The WHO unilaterally lowered the bar for the word pandemic by omitting the one essential element required by the common law, which is the essential element of “great danger to life, or high mortality rate”.
The WHOs definition of pandemic wrongfully allows for the imposition of measures merely because of an apprehension of potential danger, violating article 54 of the Siracusa principles. Resolving this breach of WHOs obligations must be addressed before any pandemic treaty is drafted."
There is much more that IOJ wanted to say but didn't get the due process to explain why it was a fools errand. So below is the transcript of what IOJ expressly wanted to say in regards to the WHO's question to the public.
Ordinary administrative measures and treatments were always available to treat covid-19, which makes a declaration of pandemic in violation of international law, however the unnecessary measures were Imposed merely because of The Who’s apprehension of potential danger.
The WHO declared the pandemic while they say pandemic was not defined, which is arbitrary and capricious on its face and especially shocking because Tedros declared march 11 2020 and we quote:
“We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic. Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It’s a word that if misused can cause unreasonable fear leading to unnecessary suffering and death. This is the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus and we have never before seen a pandemic that can be controlled at the same time.”
Below is the information so you can submit your own video to the WHO/INB:
You are invited to submit a video statement of up to 90 seconds, accompanied by a transcript, in response to the following guiding question:
"Based on your experience with the COVID-19 pandemic, what do you believe should be addressed at the international level to better protect against future pandemics?”
Statements can be submitted in any of the six official WHO languages (English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Chinese).
The submission period will open on Friday 9 September and will close on Tuesday 13 September 2022.
Further information about the registration process, the terms and conditions for participation, and the process to submit a video statement is available at https://inb.who.int/home/public-hearings/second-round
WHO will broadcast two three-hour segments of a selection of compiled video statements on the WHO website – https://inb.who.int on 29 and 30 September 2022. Other video statements will be made available on the WHO website following the hearings.
Interest of Justice video tutorial on submitting the video: https://rumble.com/v1izqtb-notice-w.h.o.-is-accepting-your-90-sec.-video-september-9-13-2022-pandemic-.html?mref=138ft6&mc=6x039
http://www.interestofjustice.org
Support the cause! https://interestofjustice.org/donation
-
6:33
Interest Of Justice
1 month agoInterest Of Justice Coalitions forming to 'Stop The WHO Pandemic Treaty
2093 -
LIVE
GussyWussie
5 hours agoReturning to one of the Best Zelda Games - Breath of the Wild
648 watching -
LIVE
Wahzdee
1 hour agoMorning Grind: Arena Breakout vs Tarkov Showdown 🎮 - Wahzvember Day 25
415 watching -
World Nomac
16 hours agoThe side of Las Vegas they don't want you to know about
335 -
LIVE
Film Threat
6 hours agoVERSUS: WICKED VS GLADIATOR II | Film Threat Versus
153 watching -
2:06:30
Barstool Yak
6 hours agoThe Yak with Big Cat & Co. Presented by Rhoback | The Yak 11-25-24
6.36K3 -
1:43:44
The Quartering
4 hours agoDr Disrespect Leaves Youtube For Rumble! With Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski
84.5K36 -
LIVE
Grant Stinchfield
2 hours agoMy Trip To The Emergency Room Exposed the Our Joke of a Health Care System
372 watching -
LIVE
RyanMatta
1 day ago $1.01 earnedOPERATION AMBER ALERT | CHILD TRAFFICKING DOCUMENTARY | EXECUTIVE PRODUCER RYAN MATTA
489 watching -
14:14
TimcastIRL
1 day agoJoe Rogan ROASTS The View For Saying He BELIEVES IN DRAGONS In HILARIOUS MOCKERY
42.4K76