Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a66/49a66f19a9d08cfa208c0843c96e5d4371804834" alt="UFOLOGY ALIEN SCIENTIST - PROJECT CAMELOT"
UFOLOGY ALIEN SCIENTIST - PROJECT CAMELOT
#XIRTUS #polska #Україна #economics
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsUSkNjKw3n2IisWnsfo_QQ/join
https://andreas.me
https://twitter.com/andreasxirtus
https://xirt.us
https://instagram.com/xirtus
https://tartarynova.com
support https://patreon.com/xirtus
join https://discord.gg/UaDfkNZZzs
VPN http://bit.ly/2SXI35i
FAN MAIL:
Andreas Xirtus
PO BOX 131
Cambridge MN, USA 55008
Sent by Dr. Travis Taylor Monday September 5, 2022 at 10:54am:
I don’t know the chain of custody of the video and I don’t know what it is. That said from the video alone there are some issues.
1. The “spere” on the 2d plane of the focal plane array is an 8 sided polygon ( octagon) and not a circle which suggests an artifact of the camera iris
2. The octagon gets thicker and thinner as the focus changes
3. While the central “cube” in the 2d FPA does appear cubish in 2d it is a square and a horseshoe and as the focus is tightened looks like an undersampled circle
4. From 1-3, this suggests the actual pattern on the FPA is a |Besinc(r)-circ(r)|^2 an Airy disk with a “d.c.stop” as it is often referred to in optics. The inverse Hankel transform of the “field part” inside the ||^2 suggests a plane wave illumination on a circular aperture or e^ikrphi times circ(bigger R) - a larger Besinc(bigger R). Note there are some coefficients missing in that r is radial spatial freq and bigger R is actual radius in aperture plane.
5. 1-4 tells us that the actual object was likely a point source a very very long way off so as to be a plane wave by the time it hit the circular aperture. That is the cause of the Besinc in the math. The hole could be either a phase correcting optic (hence the larger besinc in aperture plane) or actually a “dc stop” elsewhere in the optics.
6. This is analysis with no context. 1-5 is incorrect of course if multiple sensors saw the same type image. Did eyeballs see it this way? And what of trajectories or motion?
7. With no other data this can quickly be explained away as optical stuff in the camera.
8. So, the question is: is there other data?
I just kinda rushed through this and there are certainly some e to the i lamda stuff terms missing and such but this is the general physical optics of the video out of context.
As is always the problem we need more data on target from multiple sensors across multiple phenomenologies from multiple locations.
Travis
-
2:09:24
Xirtus
1 day agoWasn't Born Yesterday - Synctank
256 -
1:00:43
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
7 hours agoRoger Stone Destroys Mike Pence for Attacks on Trump | The StoneZONE
102K39 -
1:05:43
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoFederal Reserve on the Chopping Block—Trump’s Boldest Move Yet! - Floyd Brown, Western Journal | FOC Show
55.1K6 -
2:50:40
Melonie Mac
12 hours agoGo Boom Live Ep 38!
57K3 -
11:08
China Uncensored
11 hours agoXi Jinping's Greatest Fear
29K10 -
2:11:20
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
16 hours agoFar Left TROJAN HORSE | SPECIAL Forces in MEXICO | GERMANY under FIRE
23K13 -
1:41:00
Darkhorse Podcast
13 hours agoIf Only We’d Known: The 265th Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying
153K38 -
1:58:29
Conspiracy Pilled
3 days agoThe Vaccine Conversation (S5 - Ep17)
65K2 -
11:22
Tundra Tactical
10 hours ago $4.23 earnedUSA vs Canada HOCKEY Fight: The Real PRIDE Fighting.
66.5K8 -
54:43
LFA TV
1 day agoWhy Exposing Waste and Fraud Terrifies the Beltway | TRUMPET DAILY 2.19.25 7PM
61.2K10