5 MOST EXPENSIVE RUSSIAN BILLIONAIRE SUPERYACHTS

2 years ago
2

The 5 most expensive russian superyachts are worth over $2,000,000,000. Let's take a look at these magnificent ships, which belong to some of the world's wealthiest individuals, all of whom are Russian.

📌 OUR SOCIALS 👉 https://beacons.ai/theluxuryarchetypes
🔴 DO NOT CLICK THIS 👉 https://bit.ly/MysteryLink_
💸 SUPPORT OUR CHANNEL 👉 https://paypal.me/theluxuryarchetypes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WATCH NEXT:

INSIDE PUTIN'S SECRET $1.5 BILLION PALACE
https://youtu.be/yUshNbJ5nEc

INSIDE THE $8,500,000,000 MOST EXPENSIVE YACHTS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jUzGgZYRRk&t=163s

Conor McGregor's RARE $3 Million Lamborghini 63 Yacht:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RE-nbIRPeDw&t=130s

THE PRIVATE RESORT OF RED BULL BILLIONAIRE DIETRICH MATESCHITZ:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMT-aaNecvI
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#russian #billionaire #superyachts #superyacht #mostexpensive

00:00 5 Most Expensive Russian Billionare Superyachts
00:32 "Dragonfly" Sergey Brin - $80 Million
02:10 "Dilbar" Alisher Usmanov - $660 Million
03:44 "Anastasia," Vladimir Potanin - $72 Million
05:04 "Eclipse" Roman Abramovich - $500 Million
06:50 "Sailing & Motor Yacht A " Andrey Melnichenko - $780 Million
08:49 What do you guys think?

DISCLAIMER: We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage which is incurred from you acting or not acting as a result of reading any of our publications. You acknowledge that you use the information we provide at your own risk. Do your own research.

RIGHTS NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. ” This video and our youtube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder (s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

Loading comments...