Dr. Robert Malone: Electric fence around taboo subjects, COVID jabs are gene therapy

Dr. Malone explains that certain COVID related subjects are taboo. If you dare to publicly speak about these subjects, you will get an almost immediate and vicious shock by the defenders of that taboo.

This happened with the term 'mass formation', made popular by prof. Mattias Desmet. Almost immediately after it went viral, 'fact checks' started to pop up saying that it was nonsense, prof. Desmet was smeared, Google started to manually change search results, etc.

Another example is the term 'gene therapy', which is exactly what the COVID jabs are. It's not just Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna products, but also AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.

This is the FDA definition of gene therapy (see footnote 1 of the linked document):

"Gene therapy products are all products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome and that are administered as nucleic acids, viruses, or genetically engineered microorganisms. The products may be used to modify cells in vivo or transferred to cells ex vivo before administration to the recipient. See section III. of FDA’s guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials - Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events” dated November 2006."

https://www.fda.gov/media/89036/download

One reason that people are so sensitive about the term 'gene therapy', is because gene therapies require a much, much more rigorous set of safety tests than if you call it a regular vaccine. The barely tested COVID 'vaccines' were not even tested according to minimum requirements for vaccines, let alone the much more stringent requirement for gene therapies.

Partly due to pressure from the Trump administration, the FDA chose to require very little safety testing. This way, the products could get their emergency use authorization (EUA) sooner, which would allow them to be injected into shoulders sooner. The safety risk to the population of vaccine side-effects was subordinated.

NB: To compensate for the near absence of safety testing, the authorities promised they would monitor for post-marketing safety signals like a hawk and respond immediately if red flags became apparent. However, FOIA request proved that CDC did no such thing in practice and even claimed it wasn't their responsibility. See:

New FOIA Release Shows CDC Lied About Its VAERS Safety Monitoring Efforts | Josh Guetzkow
https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/new-foia-release-shows-cdc-lied-about

Another important reason that the vaccine cult is so hypersensitive about the term 'gene therapy', is likely that it has a very negative connotation with many people. In contrast, 'vaccine' sounds harmless. I suspect that if the COVID jabs had if the authorities had openly admitted that the COVID 'vaccines' are in fact gene therapy, the uptake would have been vastly lower. There is almost certainly much more resistance to getting injected with gene therapy than to getting what you believe to be a regular vaccine.

SOURCE

Segment from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ngjpR2IObg
👆 Video has been censored in the meanwhile

Full interview can now be found here:
https://rumble.com/v1ejdt1