Premium Only Content
The Superstition of Divorce - G.K. Chesterton - Ch. 7-9
The child is an explanation of the father and mother and the fact that it is a human child is the explanation of the ancient human ties connecting the father and mother. The more human, that is the less bestial, is the child, the more lawful and lasting are the ties. So far from any progress in culture or the sciences tending to loosen the bond, any such progress must logically tend to tighten it. …
When we offer any other system as a “career for women,” we are really proposing that an infinite number of them should become servants, of a plutocratic or bureaucratic sort. Ultimately, we are arguing that a woman should not be a mother to her own baby, but a nursemaid to somebody else’s baby. But it will not work, even on paper. We cannot all live by taking in each other’s washing, especially in the form of pinafores. In the last resort, the only people who either can or will give individual care, to each of the individual children, are their individual parents. The expression as applied to those dealing with changing crowds of children is a graceful and legitimate flourish of speech.
This triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed; it can only destroy those civilisations which disregard it. Most modern reformers are merely bottomless sceptics, and have no basis on which to rebuild; and it is well that such reformers should realise that there is something they cannot reform. You can put down the mighty from their seat; you can turn the world upside down, and there is much to be said for the view that it may then be the right way up. But you cannot create a world in which the baby carries the mother. You cannot create a world in which the mother has no authority over the baby. …
This nucleus of natural authority has always existed in the midst of more artificial authorities. It has always been regarded as something in the literal sense individual; that is, as an absolute that could not really be divided. A baby was not even a baby apart from its mother…
This short book was written in 1920, and in it Chesterton, with his usual wit and incisive logic, presents a series of articles defending marriage and indicating the weaknesses in divorce. He did this 16 years before the first Christian denomination in the world allowed its members to divorce. Till then Christendom was unanimous in standing against it. Chesterton saw clearly the trends of this time, and delivered this defense.
-
18:12:15
Chesterton Radio
1 year ago $3.16 earnedChristmas Radio Live - Holiday Fun All-Day Live Stream
31.7K3 -
LIVE
Donald Trump Jr.
3 hours agoA New Golden Age: Countdown to Inauguration Day | TRIGGERED Ep.202
4,107 watching -
LIVE
Michael Franzese
2 hours agoWhat's Behind Biden's Shocking Death Row Pardons?
1,272 watching -
13:22
Stephen Gardner
3 hours ago🔥You'll NEVER Believe what Trump wants NOW!!
37.5K89 -
54:56
Digital Social Hour
1 day ago $3.65 earnedDOGE, Deep State, Drones & Charlie Kirk | Donald Trump Jr.
15.7K -
DVR
The Trish Regan Show
4 hours agoTrump‘s FCC Targets Disney CEO Bob Iger Over ABC News Alleged Misconduct
25.4K19 -
1:48:19
The Quartering
5 hours agoElon Calls White People Dumb, Vivek Calls American's Lazy & Why Modern Christmas Movies Suck!
94.9K58 -
2:08:42
The Dilley Show
6 hours ago $28.05 earnedH1B Visa Debate, Culture and More! w/Author Brenden Dilley 12/26/2024
80.2K22 -
4:55:59
LumpyPotatoX2
8 hours agoThirsty Thursday on BOX Day - #RumbleGaming
84.3K5 -
1:04:52
Geeks + Gamers
7 hours agoDisney RATIO'D on Christmas Day | Mufasa Embarrassed By Sonic 3
62.8K4