How One Group Has Corrupted The Climate Debate On The Left

The Professional Managerial Class is corrupting the climate debate. They focus on an attack on science or an assault on facts when they should be focusing on the immorality of fossil fuel extraction.

Watch the Majority Report live Monday–Friday at 12 p.m. EST on YouTube OR listen via daily podcast at http://www.Majority.FM

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

#MajorityReport #politics

SUPPORT the show by becoming a member: http://www.jointhemajorityreport.com/

Download TMR's FREE app: http://www.majorityapp.com

TMR MERCH: http://www.shop.majorityreportradio.com

OTHER LINKS:
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport
Facebook: http://facebook.com/MajorityReport
Twitter: http://twitter.com/MajorityFM
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/majorityreport.fm/

Yeah, it's funny I proposed I submitted the book proposal in 2017. that was going to be anchored in this very PMC analysis. and for those that don't know it's the professional-managerial class was a concept coined by barbara and john and Ehrenreich in the 1970s. and then after 2017 basically the left blew up with this debate over the pace. and it polarized the 2020 primary between the Bernie and Warren factions. and it became this extremely polarizing concept. but I had to soldier through. because I really think it's important to think about climate politics. because if you look around about who's really driving climate advocacy it is what you would call the professional-managerial class. and I would actually include scientists as really a big part of that class. People the way I define it in the book are people that try to marshal credentials of some kind to carve out advantages in the labor market. and that can be degrees or licenses or any type of thing. but essentially it's mostly like using hyper-educated degrees to kind of create these kinds of professional secure middle-class types of advantages in the labor market. and so we're talking about science academics, scientists, journalists, people that work at NGOs, staffers at NGOs, government bureaucrats, agents people like this. and this is the kind of class of people that are most vocal about climate change. and essentially like there's you know there's a couple things that kind of define this class project from in a kind of material and ideological sense. The first would be that because they're so invested in using credentials and knowledge to gain these advantages they're really into making climate politics really about science and knowledge and belief. believing in science. and belief in denial. and and and really vilifying the rights not because they sanction fossil fuel extraction for profit. but more because they fund denial. and they're denying the truth. and they're doing a war against facts. or whatever and this really came to a fever pitch in the trump years right? because it was just the sort of like from an administration that was denying the truth and denying science.