Premium Only Content
Constitutional Law Scholar Explains Standing & Why Texas Election Lawsuit Was Anti-Constitutional
Categorical Imperatives - Episode # 28
"Legal standing, Texas v Pennsylvania addendum & why people who believe themselves to be the one true defender of Constitutional government have begun to be more destructive of Constitutionalism then the very people they believe they are protecting it from."
After my last episode breaking down the Texas election lawsuit and why SCOTUS made the right call Constitutionally, it became clear from the responses I got that I should have spent some time explaining what Standing is. So I made a whole video about it. This video is also something of an appeal to Trump supporters out there. This is partly a response to many misconceptions widely held by Trump supporters still about this election and especially their reaction to the Supreme Court's dismissal of the Texas Election Lawsuit. It is also meant to be an olive branch as well. I don't mean to attack anyone. I am making a direct appeal as a Constitutional Conservative to others who consider themselves Constitutional Conservatives.
These responses ran the gamut from people asking what standing mean ? And how does it work? How does it relate to citizens and government? To people under the impression standing is not actually a legal doctrine. People who didn't understand the difference between a State and a citizen (seriously), people who mistakenly believed the Supreme Court was the right venue to handle election suits are meant to be decided in the Supreme Court, People who didn't understand that the reason the Supreme Court didn't take the case had to do with limiting our ability to seek redress of grievances (rather than a limit on the Court's ability to hear the case), and people who thought that even if Texas didn't have standing the Supreme Court should have taken the case anyway, and ruled on the merits. Which would be a vast and unprecedented expansion of Federal power. And a violation of some of our Country's most important principles. Separation or Powers, Federalism, rule of law & limited government itself must be cast aside for them to get the outcome they want. These are values that I hope fellow Constitutional conservatives still actually value and still want to protect.
.
Amicus brief - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163237/20201209155924009_2020-12-9%20Texas%20Scotus%20Amici%20Brief-%20FINAL.pdf
Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events, law, politics & culture.
Categorical Imperatives On Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives
Categorical Imperatives on LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives
Lockean Liberal On Parler - https://parler.com/profile/Lockeanliberal
-
DVR
In The Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd
19 hours agoDemocrats Come Unglued | In the Litter Box w/ Jewels and Catturd Ep. 735 - 2/5/2025
17.3K16 -
1:44:25
The Quartering
3 hours agoTrump Impeachment, Democrat Insurrection, Massive Scandal At Politico & DC Crash Update!
48.7K33 -
LIVE
Dr Disrespect
4 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - KINGDOM COME: DELIVERANCE 2 - FIRST IMPRESSION
3,638 watching -
37:54
CryptoWendyO
2 hours ago $0.03 earnedBEST DAY IN CRYPTO HISTORY
301 -
LIVE
Film Threat
7 hours agoVERSUS: FANTASTIC FOUR + CAPTAIN AMERICA + QUENTIN TARANTINO'S EPIC RANT | Film Threat Versus
67 watching -
9:06
CryptoWrld
11 hours ago $0.82 earnedHow Nonprofits Use Blockchain Tech
8.87K2 -
16:38
SLS - Street League Skateboarding
14 days agoRayssa Leal's Most Clutch SLS Wins Ever! 🥶🏆
73.8K4 -
1:06:29
Russell Brand
5 hours agoGaza Takeover? Trump’s Bold Plan Sparks Global Outrage – SF532
113K246 -
1:57:32
The Charlie Kirk Show
4 hours agoGaza Thoughts + DOGE The Destroyer | Sen. Schmitt, Benz | 2.5.2025
124K28 -
1:21:08
Simply Bitcoin
4 hours ago $1.30 earnedNEW REPORT: Bitcoin ETF Insider Doubles Down on UNTHINKABLE 2030 prediction! | EP 1176
33.5K1