How Can You Explain a 50% Rise in All-Cause Mortality ?

The Medicare Data: How Can You Explain a 50% Rise in All-Cause Mortality for an Intervention That's Supposed to Save Lives?

Steve Kirsch: "How can you explain a 50% rise in all-cause mortality after the vaccines and boosters rolled out? That's the problem. They can't explain it. You can't explain a 50% rise in all-cause mortality after the intervention that's supposed to reduce all-cause mortality was rolled out. They don't want to explain it. That is why they are never going to show you the Medicare data."

Collusion and Malfeasance: What's the Chance That All Four Companies Would Pick the Spike Protein?

Sub optimal Vaccine Design at Every Level

- When developing a vaccine, you would normally pick a part of the organism that is not intrinsically harmful; they picked the most dangerous portion.

- Next, you would pick a part of the organism that is genetically most stable. Well, they picked the bit that apparently mutates most quickly.

- You must also try and pick a part of the organism that's most different from you so that when you elicit an immune response, it won't overlap and hit you. However, the spike protein was the least dissimilar option they had.