Amber Heard HOAX & ACLU LIES!! The COVER UP no one else is talking about.

If you like my videos and want to help support my channel…consider visiting https://www.buymeacoffee.com/hachimama to make a small donation! ♡ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

♡ TAKEAWAYS ♡

SOURCES: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskConservatives/comments/uetb8f/the_aclu_helped_write_amber_heards_wapo_oped_that/

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/ufzuvv/aclu_ghostwrote_famous_washington_post_amber/

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/us/aclu-free-speech.html

ACLU & Amber Heard

Some of you might be wondering what Ben Chew’s statement about the ACLU being a CO-CONSPIRATOR in the Amber Heard trial was about.

FAIRFAX COUNTY WEBSITE JD VS AH BACKGROUND AH & JD TIMELINE Johnny Depp is suing Amber Heard (who is counter-suing) and it’s looking more and more like it is a hoax. If only we had a process for deciding on guilt/innocence in which people were due.

ACLU HISTORY
Fighting for Nazis, Charlottesville
Freedom of speech is not important for popular opinions.

The ACLU helped write Amber Heard's WaPo op-ed that is central to Johnny Depp's defamation suit, after being promised donations from the proceeds of her divorce. What is going on here?
In essence, the case has revealed that the ACLU wrote the OP-Ed pretending to be Heard in exchange for a donation, explicitly timed to coincide with the release of an Aquaman film to drum up public attention for the premiere and/or to benefit from it. To quote another article:
The ACLU also claims it was charged with pitching the op-ed to a number of outlets, with the organization originally considering the likes of Teen Vogue and The New York Times, before settling on The Washington Post. Gerry Johnson, another ACLU associate, can be seen discussing the opportunity to release the op-ed just before the release of Aquaman, in a bid to drum up press around Heard before the premiere.“Since draft turned out pretty strong and Aquaman slated to do large numbers I’m wondering what you think about it?” he wrote in an email thread. Another staffer is then alleged to have agreed that the timing of the op-ed should be published as quickly as possible, “to capitalize on the tremendous campaign for Aquaman.” The news might have implications for the ongoing legal dispute between Depp and Heard (a defamation case over that piece ruining Depp's reputation and professional career, alleging he was abusive, while he has presented evidence he argues that it was actually Heard who was emotionally and physically abusive) as correspondences show that the piece originally explicitly named Depp (the final version is vague, hence the dispute over if it is defamation)...

..But I am more interested in (and the Mods want the comments on this post to focus on, per my conversations with them clearing this post in advance) hearing legal professionals or others who are interested in law or who might have experience with Civil Liberty organizations chime in to comment on the ACLU's involvement.

The fact that: They decided to get involved when it is not a state or federal case involving civil liberties. They did so at least partially in exchange for a monetary donation from Heard. They ghost-wrote an article that was presented as coming from Heard herself. They timed it to coincide with a major movie release Heard had a vested interest in the success off Seems pretty eyebrow-raising to me. Are there ethical issues here? How common is it for the ACLU or other groups to involve themselves in a he-said-she-said dispute between two private parties, or to ghostwrite articles? What do you think the impact this will have on the ACLU's place in the legal landscape if anything.

The ACLU helped Amber Heard draft the Washington Post article accusing Johnny Depp of abuse after the organization was promised a $3.5m donation from her divorce – though at least $500,000 of it eventually came from a fund connected to Tesla founder Elon Musk, jurors in the Depp- Heard defamation trial heard on Thursday.

Terence Dougherty, testified that the organization decided to propose Heard as an ambassador for the group after Heard pledged

Some A.C.L.U. lawyers and staff members argue that the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and the press — as well as freedom of religion, assembly, and petitioning the government — is more often a tool of the powerful than the oppressed.
“First Amendment protections are disproportionately enjoyed by people of power and privilege,” said Dennis Parker, who directed the organization’s Racial Justice Program until he left in late 2018.
She had 13 months from the time she received the last installment to the moment she was sued for thE Op-Ed. She could have paid at any time that she began receiving installments.

#DeppVsHeard #JusticeForJohnnyDepp #AmberTurd