Competitive gamer review and comparison: Logitech gaming mouse G102/203, G403. And Zeus mousepad

2 years ago
16

Current, up to date rankings & recommendations: https://github.com/MaximilianKohler/Archive/wiki/Mice,-keyboards,-gaming

Summary: the sensor performance on these mice is finally up to par with the MLT04. Unfortunately the G102 shape is bad & too thin, and the G403 is too heavy. Mousepad good and $10.

No problems with the coating/grip for either dry or sweaty hands. No problems with anything other than what is detailed in the video. Good mice overall if you don't have problems with the shapes & weights.

I don't see a significant difference in sensor performance, but I would lean towards the G102/G203 Mercury sensor. Mercury sensor info: https://www.overclock.net/forum/375-mice/1615853-g102-mercury-sensor-info.html

"G102/G203 is G Pro in half the price" Same size as Ninox aurora but 1 mm wider. H 116.6 mm. W 62.15 mm. Depth: 38.2 mm. 85g. 8k dpi.

LEDs are really bright. Thankfully you can dim them and turn them off.
Default DPI steps are 400, 800, 1600, 3200.
Buttons are loud.
Middle scroll wheel is noisy. And too far back to scroll with middle finger in palm grip.
With Enotus it's measuring around 800dpi exactly for 10cm. Got 4m/s. 980hz. 97.5-99% precision. Smoothness 16.7% when moved in large circles - nothing happens when small circle.
LOD is nice and low.

Cramps hand, but sensor feels pretty flawless.

G403: PMW3366. H 124mm, W 68mm, Depth 43mm. 12k dpi. LEDs are dimmer. Buttons are quieter. Shape is better than the G203, and pretty similar (but still better) to the Finalmouse 2015. Significantly heavier than both the FM and G203. Too heavy.

Loading comments...