Premium Only Content
Yes, Kathy Barnette can Win in the General Election
Show Sponsor: https://noqreport.com/mps
Despite the various attempts by Hannity et al to cast doubt on Barnette's character, the one argument that seems to be sticking with many conservatives is her electability. Many are basing this on claims that she was embarrassingly defeated in 2020 by a "weak" Democrat. On Thursday's show, he said [emphasis added]:
"Kathy Barnett has not gotten any kind of vigorous, rigorous vetting that is now proving to be a massive problem in this race. Here's why... In 2020 she was not a serious candidate in her congressional race she lost to a pretty weak Democrat by 19 points."
What Hannity doesn't mention is that the "weak" Democrat was Madeleine Dean, a Democrat incumbent in a very blue district. Compared to Dan David who ran against Dean in 2018, Barnette dramatically outperformed him, getting 48% more votes than David got in his race against Dean two years earlier.
Hannity and others are hoping that voters will equate losing in 2020 in a congressional race to a loss in 2022 in a senate race. This is unambiguously false and extremely disingenuous for them to rely on the ignorance of many voters. Her very strong performance in a very blue district is why she would almost certainly win in a statewide senate race.
The oldest play in the GOP Establishment's playbook is to say that a conservative's past controversial remarks disqualifies them, that we should go with the "sensible" choice so we can defeat the Democrat. That's what Hannity is doing here. Of course, he was singing a very different tune in 2016 with Donald Trump, who had exponentially more "baggage" from past actions and remarks going into the general election than Kathy Barnette. She has offensive Tweets. Trump had so much more that some said would prevent him from winning, yet here we are.
Voters aren't as stupid as Hannity, Democrats, and the GOP Establishment hope. We look at a candidate based on what we perceive they'll be able to do for us. My support for Barnette is based on her ideas, but also based on aspects of Dr. Oz that she does not share.
-
1:31:04
The JD Rucker Show
7 days agoThe Luigi Conspiracy, Plus Strange Drones, and Actor Neal McDonough
2.44K4 -
1:17:48
Tucker Carlson
3 hours agoTom Homan’s Plan to Destroy the Cartel Empire, End Child Trafficking, and Secure the Border for Good
83.1K88 -
1:06:28
Russell Brand
4 hours agoWho Ordered the Hit on Russia’s General Krylov? - SF516
109K167 -
The Kevin Trudeau Show
3 hours agoWhat Men Do Wrong In Relationships | Ep. 75
2.33K2 -
12:41
Gun Owners Of America
2 hours agoWe're Fighting Back Against Mexico In Court!
7.98K3 -
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoThe CR Quagmire + An Hour of PBD + Catholic in Hollywood | Davis, Patrick Bet David, Rep. Burlison
83.1K26 -
32:54
Kicking Mustang
8 hours ago $1.38 earnedWatch the Best Ghillie Sniper Moments of 2024...
14.1K3 -
49:34
PMG
14 hours ago $0.27 earned"Hannah Faulkner and Ron Berutti | NEW SUPREME COURT CASES"
10.5K1 -
28:29
The Boomer Effect
15 hours agoPondering Life in Modern America
8.17K -
1:01:44
Grant Stinchfield
2 hours ago $3.81 earnedDon't Focus on the Drones... Focus on the Mysterious Floating Orbs!
26.2K7