Wealth

BOOM! Trump Just Posted This On Truth Social And It'S Breaking The Internet!!!!

WARNING! What Is About To Happen Is Going To Destroy Us! And There Is No Way To Stop It!!

Last week during the Q&A session of Freedom Hour, Peymon caught a sneaky IRS spy attempting to catch Peymon saying something or agreeing to something wrong. In this week’s Freedom Hour, Peymon will replay the live recording for those who missed it and comment on it. How should you treat these sneaky IRS agents when they try to question you? Find out tonight! For over 30 years, Peymon has been exposing IRS fraud and helping Americans legally stop filing and paying income taxes. Now, he is taking direct action to put an end to this government overreach once and for all! What are Lock-in Letters? These letters coerce employers into stealing money from their employees’ paychecks, disregarding their legal exemptions and personal financial situations. This IRS scam forces Americans into an endless cycle of theft, fear, and financial control—but that ends TODAY!

In this interview, Rafi Farber discusses Trump's push for auditing Fort Knox, highlighting the shift toward greater financial transparency. He emphasizes how inflation plays a crucial role in government power and corruption, and explains that gold ownership is more complicated than simply possessing the metal. Farber points to gold outflows from London as a sign of market stress and increasing demand for physical gold. The behavior of both retail and institutional investors shapes the dynamics of the gold market, with high borrowing fees for GLD indicating a growing preference for physical gold. He also predicts that gold revaluation could lead to significant debt devaluation, underscoring the importance of staying informed and maintaining a positive mindset amid economic uncertainty. SWAP SPECIAL WHILE SUPPLIES LAST: 1 oz gold bullion bars/coins for MS62 $20 Liberties CALL US: 1-888-81-LIBERTY (1-888-815-4237) or email your name and phone number to LibertyAndFinance@Protonmail.com INTERVIEW TIMELINE: 0:00 Intro 0:53 Fort Knox audit 8:30 London gold outflows 11:30 GLD outflows 15:00 Retail market 17:15 $3000 gold 18:50 Gold revaluation 23:50 Last thoughts _____________________________ Subscribe for our FREE newsletter - #1 place for gold & silver news & commentary: http://libertyandfinance.com _____________________________ CANADIANS CAN NOW BUY SILVER & GOLD ONLINE IN $CAD and support this channel! Go to https://mfbullion.ca, and during checkout under the dropdown selection “How did you hear of us (optional),” select: “LibertyAndFinance - Dunagun Kaiser” ! Social Media links YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/LibertyAndFinance Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/LibertyAndFinance Google Podcasts: https://bit.ly/3gYtU8Q Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/LibertyandFinance Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/dunagun Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LibertyAndFinance Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LibertyAndFinance/ X: https://x.com/DunagunKaiser Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/libertyandfinance Gab: https://gab.com/LibertyAndFinance Parler: https://parler.com/libertyfinance Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/show/1023449 Amazon podcasts: https://amzn.to/3SLyANx iHeart Radio: https://iheart.com/podcast/102551300/ Patreon: https://www.Patreon.com/LibertyAndFinance Donate to Support Our Mission! https://www.Patreon.com/LibertyAndFinance or https://www.paypal.me/ReluctantPreppers _____________________________ Liberty and Finance LLC receives financial compensation from its sponsors. The compensation is used is to fund both sponsor-specific activities and general report activities, website, and general and administrative costs. Sponsor-specific activities may include aggregating content and publishing that content on the Liberty and Finance website, creating and maintaining company landing pages, interviewing key management, posting a banner/billboard, and/or issuing press releases. The fees also cover the costs for Liberty and Finance to publish sector-specific information on our site, and also to create content by interviewing experts in the sector. Liberty and Finance LLC does accept stock for payment of sponsorship fees. Sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734. The Information presented in Liberty and Finance is provided for educational and informational purposes only, without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including warranties of accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose. The Information contained in or provided from or through this forum is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other advice. The Information on this forum and provided from or through this forum is general in nature and is not specific to you the User or anyone else. YOU SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY DECISION, FINANCIAL, INVESTMENTS, TRADING OR OTHERWISE, BASED ON ANY OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ON THIS FORUM WITHOUT UNDERTAKING INDEPENDENT DUE DILIGENCE AND CONSULTATION WITH A PROFESSIONAL BROKER OR COMPETENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR. You understand that you are using any and all Information available on or through this forum AT YOUR OWN RISK. Some or all of this video description and timeline has been written by AI tool: https://chatgpt.com/ All Rights Reserved.

What a trip! The following pages are chock full of valuable information! To remove highlights, click on Edit - Select All - and then clear the formatting! The writer highlighted what seemed valuable, which was almost everything! The sender looked up every statute and code cited in this + 3 hour audio to verify it was correct! Yup! Jean Keating is winning because he assesses the tax against those using his credit to their benefit and not paying up! Embedded in the audio and in the transcript is the truth about mortgage foreclosure and what you need to focus on to file your counter claim which is mandatory! Alleged lender took your "note" and put you into an investment contract without your knowledge under the Statues of Fraud (Colorado UCC 4-2-201). Your "note" is a "registered security" and you have a claim of recoupment on the proceeds: it is spelled out in the various laws. Enjoy! To listen to the audio you will find it on www.talkshoe.com - 39904# on December 9th of 2010! +++++++++++++++++++++ Dec 9, 2010 Jean Keating on Angela Stark Tax law, commercial law, accounting and trust law, adverse claims and void judgments Why you are not winning in court. Well, I’ve been teaching for 50 years and doing research for 50 years. I have a degree in commercial banking law and commercial law and I understand the Uniform Commercial Code and trust law which all 4 are related. You have to understand tax law, trust law, commercial law and accounting if you don’t you won’t understand anything or what the court is operating under. Well, if you go in court, these courts have 2 jurisdictions - a public side operates in commercial and a private side that operates under Common Law and their Courts of contract. If you contract with them they have Jurisdiction. To not contract, make a Special Appearance. Make a Letter Rogatory and every time I have done one I have been successful, you have to read UCC 3-501 and 3-502 it tells you how to do a conditional acceptance upon proof of claim. You have to challenge their right, most of these people are making presentments on behalf of someone else, they don’t ever tell you their authority to do that is. When they do these loans that’s what there doing on a mortgage loan they are making a presentment on behalf of someone else. You can kill all these mortgage on the administrative level; they should never get to court. What about a non-judicial state? They never go to court anyway! A judicial, they file a complaint against you. Non-Judicial they can’t do that, they can not do a non-judicial because it it’s a confessed judgment. The Deed of Trust contains a confessed judgment that is where they get the power of sale. Read the power of sale clause in the Deed of Trust. When a loan goes into default they enter the right under the power of sale, that’s a confessed judgment. In CA in 1131 to 1134 of the CA civil code you cannot do a confessed judgment on a mortgage loan unless the borrower has consented to itt. That means he has to file an Oath and Order with the court and it has to be certified by an Attorney. All these Deeds Of Trust contain a confessed judgment. That is number 1! Number 2 is you’re not dealing in a mortgage loan, you are dealing in an investment contract and they are holding you liable on a contract that you are not a party that is the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Under the Statue of Frauds which is Sec 1624 of the CA civil code and its in the UCC at 2-201 Sec 2-201 and the Statue of Frauds was designed to prevent the very thing they are doing. The Statue of Frauds is evidentiary and if you don’t raise it, you waive it. I don’t know of one person that has ever raised the Statue of Fraud as a defense. The land mark decision is the Seacrest Case because when you go to closing they are doing a loan modification. Because they made you a party to a contract to which you are not a party to. You are a 3rd party Contractee to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the proof of that is that is where your mortgage payments are going. The Payments are going to the investors as a cash flow claim. There not going to the servicing company, they are merely passing the payments on to the investors. Why are they giving them to the investor? Another thing to study is; that you are dealing in securities not negotiable instruments. What you call a promissory note is a security because it has a maturity of more than 9 months. All these mortgages have 30 and 20 year maturities. Read Title 15>28>78 (c) 10; any note that has a maturity of 9 months or less is excluded from Because it’s not a security it’s a note. Where have you ever seen one promissory note that has had a maturity of 9 months or less? You haven’t! And there is also suppose to be a Disclaimer that is suppose to be in the credit application under Title 16 16 cfr 433.2. Which says that the buyer/seller take it subject to all the defenses and claims that the buyer could assert against any transferee or any buyer who buys it. Or anybody who sells it, but they take it out of these loan applications. None of the applications have that disclaimer in it. That means there is no holder in due course. Because if you read UCC 3-302 of the UCC a holder in due course takes it free of all claims and defenses that the payor could assert against any payee or assignee or transferee. They don’t take it free of that they take it subject to your claims and defenses. What are your claims and defenses? 1.) Under UCC 3-305 you have a claim in recoupment. Which is a counter-claim and that’s the same language in Rule 13 of FRCVP Rule 13 says there are 2 types of counter-claims, there is a mandatory and permissive counter claim. • Mandatory arises from the same transaction and occurrence as the plaintiffs claim. • No one is filing a counter-claim that is why they are running over you! You can’t be a creditor unless you file a counter-claim! UCC 3-305 2.) 2nd Claim is UCC 3-306; you have a proprietary and possessionary and property interest in the note and its proceeds. You have the right to rescind negotiation of the transaction. Negotiation means the endorsement on the note. They always endorse these notes “pay to the order of”, you have a right to rescind that negotiation. No one ever does it because they don’t read the UCC. When you are dealing in securities it is governed by Article 8 not Article 3 of the UCC, what you call a note is a security and it is a non-negotiable instrument. If you read the Adjustable; sub-prime mortgages have an adjustable rate rider that goes with the note. The rider modifies the conditions of payment and supplements and governs the promissory note. UCC 3-106(d) it can’t be a negotiable instrument if it is subject or governed by extraneous documents outside of the promissory note. And they make it subject to the adjustable rate rider and the deed of trust. There are a dozen cases that say all mortgage notes are non negotiable instruments. If they are non-negotiable they are not governed by Article 3, there governed by general contract law, specifically Restatement of Law Second series under contract Section 164 which has to do with mis-representation which means its subject to recission. If you read 226.23 of TILA or Reg Z : 12 cfr in the Appendix there is a Form H-8 and H-9 it is in the Appendix. The lender has to give you the Form to rescind, that’s all in 226.23. It says that it doesn’t apply to residential mortgage loans but go down to in Section H it says at foreclosure you have the right to rescind the loan transaction if 2 things occur: 1.) there was no mortgage brokerage fee charged and 2.) you were not given notice of the right to rescind 3.) or your were not given the appropriate Form. The form in Appendix H-8 Form and H-9. So you could rescind the transaction when it goes to foreclosure. They will tell you only have 72 hours, if they did not give you notice the statute of limitations does not toll until they tell you, you have a right to rescind. You can do it at foreclosure. Another thing you are not in a loan transaction, your in an investment contract UCC 4-102 under Applicability says if an item is includable in Article 3 its governed by Article 8. Article 8 governs Article 3 because you are dealing in securities. All these notes are securities, not notes or negotiable instruments. Article 8 governs 3 and 4. What you have to do is you have a claim in recoupment or a claim under 3-306 to the proceeds and a right to rescind the negotiation. And you have a possessionary and property right in the proceeds of the investment contract. File the claim! If you read 8-505 to 8-508 it tells you how to file a claim! The claim is called an Adverse Claim, it’s defined in 8-102 and 8-105 of Article 8. All these mortgage transactions are governed by Article 8 or Article 2 and you have never filed a counter claim. That is why they File a 1099 – A because they say you abandoned your claim or recoupment which is a counter claim and your possessionary right to the proceeds from the sale of the security under the investment contract to which you are undisclosed 3rd party in the contract under the statute of Frauds. If they are going to hold you liable under a contract which you are an undisclosed 3rd party and it has not been subscribed to by you and you have not memorialized it then you have a right to the proceeds. Go after the proceeds. It tells you how to do that, no body is doing that! Another reason your loosing in court is because none of these courts have subject matter jurisdiction over land. Only a land court and in Florida are the county courts and it says that in the constitution. If you go into the judiciary of the Florida Title 5 Sec20 it tells you what courts have jurisdiction. County courts have jurisdiction over land, so what you are doing are contracting with those that don’t have jurisdiction. These attorneys don’t have jurisdiction to represent anyone! Read the dead man statues which were codified under Probate law, Rule 601 under Federal Rules of Evidence, it goes to competency to testify, they are incompetent to testify for a dead person. Who is a dead person, the corporations, they are dead because they are not real. What an attorney does is they testify on behalf of all these banks and if you don’t raise the objection, you loose the right! That is the first thing to do. “I am before this court by special appearance without waiving any rights remedies or defenses, statutory or procedural”. I put that admonition at the top of my pleadings, that way you don’t waive jurisdiction, otherwise you are going in on contract with these people. You contract then when they rule against you even though they didn’t have subject matter jurisdiction you gave them that, you gave them jurisdiction but not subject matter, but you have to raise it. Also in personam, in order for the court to have jurisdiction the plaintiff has to be there and the defendant, both party’s, real party’s in interest that have standing under Article III Section2, standing is a threshold issue and the court is suppose to address that sua sponte and they are not doing it! Some do some don’t! So you have the responsibility to bring it up, standing is a threshold issue. None of these servicing company’s that are foreclosing on all these loans have standing to come to court to foreclose on your loan. Because they don’t own the loans, who owns the security, the borrower does. That’s why this CountryWide and the Kemp case, this women an employee from CountryWide testified that none of the notes are transferred. That means all of these Real Estate Investment Trusts don’t have the note. April Charney in her admonition says they never transfer the notes nor do the sell them they keep them. The reason they keep them is because they don’t own them. They can’t transfer them and if they did transfer them, they have to do that to get the exemption otherwise they have to pay taxes. If they don’t pay out 90% of their taxable income in interest and dividends to the investors then they have a tax liability. They do not qualify under Section 862 and 852 of Title 26 as a Real Estate Investment Trust so there in possession of contraband. So what they are doing is billing you for the tax that they owe. No one raises this issue because they do not understand it. That is why every mortgage is a tax issue. There are 2 issues: an investment contract and a tax. The reason a tax comes into play is because they never transferred the security, they kept the security. So that means all the investors that bought cash flow claims under the Pooling and Servicing agreement have got worthless paper. That means there is a cloud on every title and none of these notes were ever securitized. That means every B-5 Prospectus, S-3 Registration Statement, 8-K Current Report are all invalid. That are filed with the SEC because the notes; the security were never transferred at closing. The investors put up all this capital and in the law review by David Levithin (SP?) that goes into the ramifications. The banks that allegedly financed all these loans are going to have to give all the money back to the investors as cash flow claims because they never transferred; they bought something that they never got. They paid for all these notes, or securities and they were never transferred to them, they don’t own them. The banks are going to have to give it back: there is not enough money in all the banks to pay these investors back. So what does that mean, you are going to have a put-back. This professor that went up to testify before congress on the sub-finance committee under community housing, he testified before congress as to what is going to happen if congress does not do something. What are they going to do? It remains to be seen. I am telling you what the ramifications are, China will probably buy up all these loans or they will bail out everybody, or confiscate all your money in the banks. One of those is going to happen, just watch. In response to the lady that asked about the 1099 OID all these people that are filing 1099 OID’s and 1096 and 1040, 1040-V they are not filing Form 8281. An 8281 identities who as the issuer of the OID is under Title 15 Sec 78 c (a)(8) – go read it! It identifies you as the issuer, because you did not identify yourself as the issuer, you don’t have a claim. IRS Publication 1212 page 2 that you must file an 8281 when you file the OID. You must read the publications! That is what you need to file as the issuer. Also if you read your deed of trust, this is in every deed of trust under payments, which in most all of them is number 3 and if you go read it, this is what I mean no one reads anything, don’t complain about lack of disclosure but they never read the deed of trust it tells you what they are doing. It tells you that if there is any money owed at maturity you can pay it at maturity. So how can the note be in default, if you have a right by contract, the DOT is a contract, and you signed it, how can they foreclose when you can make any payment at maturity on the note under the DOT. How can the mortgage be in default or foreclosure? Have you ever heard that? Read every word, every sentence, and every phrase. It is an unconscionable contract with clogging provisions. Clogging provisions extinguish your equity of redemption. If they sell your security how are you going to redeem it if they sell it to someone else and give you the note back, don’t you always have the right to redeem a loan. That is more proof it is not a loan, it is an investment contract. Does anyone have any questions? There is an IRS form 8281, read instructions for 8282 and 8283 read all 3. In 1951 they passed a law under Title 26, Section 2038 and 2514, it is called the Power of Appointment Act of 1951. The donor has total power, every one of these mortgage loan transactions is a donor : donee Which means it is a Class 5 Gift and Estate Tax under 60 02090 Decoding Manual, IRS Processing Manual of 2010. If you go in there that all 1096’s 1098, 1040, 1099 all W-2, W-4’s are Class 5 Gift and Estate Taxes they have nothing to do with an income Tax. 1040 forms you don’t report gift and estate taxes on a 1040, that’s for income. All Class 5 Gift and Estate Taxes are on a 706 or 709. There are two types of taxes: Form 706 is the generation skipping tax and Form 709 is a gift tax form. There are 2 types of taxes, generation skipping transfer tax (706) and a gift tax (709). If you go read Publication 950 you have a $3.5 mil Unified Tax Credit that means if you know about accounting. Corporations use that $3.5 mil credit they use it as money. Corporations use tax credit as money. They give tax credits to banks and banks will loan money on tax credits We have a $3.5 mil Unified Tax Credit under Publication 950 on all estate taxes and $1 Mil UTC or exclusion on the gift side. They bill if you read the 709 for them bill; the exclusion, you have 348,000 built into the form, it is in the form. I know that none of you wage earners make more than $348,000.00. What is wrong with this picture! With a 1099 A you have to send a Form 56! 8281 identifies you as the issuer of the OID. They are penalizing the OIDs because there is no 8281 filed. Every one of us has the power individually to take back what we know as the kingdom of God. We have special drawing rights on the IMF. Did you know that? All there corporations are debtors in possession under chapter 11. All these corporations are debtors to the corporation. We all have our remedy. 1099 A, B C you can run your bank Under Title 31 USC we are private bankers I did a 1099 OID for 2006, 07 and 08 – how do I fill out the forms for a checking and savings account, for my money of equity. Read 1271 to 1288 of Title 26 Everything is an OID, because it is a public debt instrument. When you write a check it is a public debt instrument. You have issued it as an OID or withdrawal. But on the 8281 you have to have a CUSIP number. That is why it is done wrong! Everybody that is doing redemption is doing it wrong. When they send you a bill, the bill represents that they accessed your credit for that much. OK, you have to file a tax return and assess the tax. That is why they never redeem the debt because you never assessed it, because it is a tax. You are the only one that can assess it because its your credit they are using. If you don’t report it as income to the IRS how are they going to give you a refund? You do a pay order on the bill “Pay to the Department of Treasury, Charge the sum said to the person that Not an A4V it’s a money order! Your paying the tax to the IRS and the IRS can bill the account of the person that sent you the bill. Your not doing that so they are billing you for it. They go into your account and get the money then send you a coupon or bill, they are double dipping. They keep the coupon and that is a check plus the check you sent to them. They got paid twice! If you think is not what is going on you are in for a rude awakening! The court assessed me $80,000.00 fine and I did a “pay to the order of “and assessed the tax to them. I never heard from them again! They have to pay the tax on the bill on $80,000.00. Every bill is a tax bill! So take each bill and do “Pay to the order of the IRS (original to IRS) and send a copy to the person that sent you the bill along with a 1040 V, 1040 and 1096 and an 1099 OID. Put it in as income! You are reporting it to the IRS as income. How many 1040’s can you file in a year? It depends on how many transactions you have. Put all transactions on one form if you want to wait until the end of the year. They are using your money and not reporting it. Who keeps track when you write a check? Do you do that? OK, how are you going to balance your checking account? Who does that? The IRS can’t balance your account, credit account unless you file a return. Reporting the income, you have to do it because its your income. Right! Do a pay to the order on the IRS bill itself, the IRS has a DUNS number. They are a corporation! They are doing business. What they are doing is they are trying to find out if you know what you are doing! They are testing you to see if you know what you are doing. They are telling you they are double dipping. So still send in the 8281 with the 1099 OID. Your not an issuer unless you file an 8281, Publication 1212 says you must file an 8281. It is mandatory! These courts, none have jurisdiction to do anything. They are not courts they are privately owned trading company’s. I make a contract on the private side with a conditional acceptance! I stopped a $60,000.00 car loan by writing a letter to the judge. He took the case off the calendar and dismissed the motion for default judgment and dismissed the writ of possession. You go in on the public side with courts that have no jurisdiction, you are contracting with them and you give them jurisdiction by contract. They can contract with you, I don’t contract with them. Where is your authority? I’ll accept that on proof of claim. What is your authority form making a presentment on behalf of someone else. Do they ever on the foreclosure do they ever send you the note? Do you know they have to present the instrument also, they have to tell you their authority for making the presenting, but they have give you the instrument. They have to exhibit the instrument. Have you ever made them exhibit the instrument? Did you know if you get an abstract of title, from the title company that it will show the loan was paid full at closing. There called Titled papers! The Title company has the abstract of Title which is the record of the deeds and notes, where they have been, who is using them. The Title company has all of this! Ask the Title company for the abstract of title. Who holds the Errors and Omissions? Make a claim on the errors and omissions on the loans. Did you know that under RESPA they cannot receive any kick back on a mortgage loan which is a federally funded loan. They call them mortgage loans, but they are really investment contracts. They violate RESPA and that is an E&O claim and you can collect on the E&O. RE the CUSIP number on the 8281, how do I fill this out? This is how you identify who the issuer is. You are not doing that! Information Return for Publicly Offered Original Issue Discount Instruments UCC 4-4.5-104 – defines the originator, originator of the first funds transfer. When you read UCC 4-3-105 of the UCC it tells you who the issuer is and the issue. Under Subsection (a) it defines what the issue is, and (c) defines what issuer is. The issuer is the drawer and the maker! If you sign the mortgage notes you are the issuer by legal definition. Does that tell you anything! What did you sign you endorsed the security. Well, don’t you have a proprietary interesting the proceeds from the sale of the security. They made you a party to the investment contract. Well, so why aren’t you claiming it? This is why people are not winning in court. This is a UCC Article 8-102 (a)(1) “Adverse Claim” “A claim that a claimant has a property interest in the financial asset and that it is a violation of the rights of the claimant for another person hold, transfer or deal with the financial asset.” UCC 8-102 (9) “A financial asset is a security.” You got a property interest in a financial assets, isn’t that what UCC 3-306 says…property interest. And when you go to UCC 8-105 a person has Notice of an adverse claim if the person knows of the adverse claim. They know you have an adverse claim, they had notice of it at closing. Aren’t they aware of facts sufficient to indicate that there is a significant probability that the adverse claim exists and deliberately avoid the information that would establish evidence of the adverse claim. Don’t they have a duty imposed by statute or regulation to investigate whether an adverse claim exists. Don’t they have knowledge that a financial asset or interest therein has been transferred? All this 8-105, then 8-505 tells you how to file the claim. You funded the whole thing! Read on the internet the Affidavit by Neil Garfield he explains it. He says the money came from the investors, on a pay forward. But that is wrong! Before they ever had a borrower in place they had the capital so the investors put up the capital for these REMICs before they had the mortgage loan in place. They did it under the condition that you put up the security. Doesn’t that make you the creditor? The capital that the investor put up was predicated on your putting up the security to the servicing company. Aren’t you, didn’t you give them the capital for the investors money. Wasn’t the pay forward done by the investors, before there ever was ever a loan in place? Caller: The investors money did not go to my security it went to my security it went to the bankers and lenders to buy the insurance policy’s credit default swaps and fund their pool of money so they could pay back the investors. But they put up that capital based on your security, that you issued, that gives you a proprietary interest in it. If you withdrew all the securities from the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and from the trust fund what would they have, nothing! Caller: so if they didn’t have the right to the investor’s money if they didn’t have my security. That’s right! They would have not put up the money up in the first place unless they were guaranteed capital from the borrower. So the borrower has a proprietary interest in the proceeds from the security. But you are not making the claim! That is why they put the Disclaimer in 16 CFR 433.2; they take it subject to all the defenses and claims that can assert against the seller. Well they can’t be a holder, a holder takes it free of all defenses and claims. So they are not holders in due course. What does UCC 3-305 say? Defenses and claims in recoupment that means counter claims, go look it up!0 UCC 3-305(c): “it says the obligor is not obliged to pay the instrument if the person seeking to enforce the instrument does not have the rights of a holder in due course.” What does that tell you? If there taking it subject to your claims and defenses then are they a holder in due course? No! Doesn’t that say you don’t have to pay it? So why are they foreclosing on your property when they are not a holder in due course, because you are not raising the defense. You are not in a land court; you’re in a privately owned trading company. In California do you know where the county courts are? Read the constitution! I haven’t looked it up but do they have county courts in California? They do! Ok, where are they located? Well, I assume it’s like where you fight tickets and things like that? Those are the only courts that have jurisdiction over land, none of these courts have jurisdiction over land and no one is bringing this up. They go in and these courts are running over them. Lots of questions: So, I guess to recap just the 8281 I am still not sure how to fill it out. I will figure it out. Just put in who the issuer is? Let me go over it quick. Let me pull it up, hang on! This applies to everyone not just you! IRS Form 8281: It has a CUSIP number because it is a security. No Notes have a CUSIP numbers, only securities have CUSIP numbers. You can give the DTC your SS number or a Broker Dealer that you want to know what your CUSIP number is, he can tell you in 30 minutes. He will tell you what your CUSIP number is. ISSUER NAME: YOU TAX ID: SS# ADDRESS: NAME REPRESENTATIVE: SEE INSTRUCTIONS/READ THEM ADDRESS OF REPRESENTATIVE/BROKER PART II CUSIP NUMBER: TYPE OF INSTRUMENT FIXED OR VARIABLE RATE ISSUE PRICE: AMOUNT OF MORTGAGE INTEREST PAYMENT DATES: AMOUNT OF OID FOR ENTIRE ISSUE YTM: DATE VALUED AT MATURITY 360 x PAYMENT DESCRIPTION OF DEBT INSTRUMENTS: FINANCIAL ASSETS UCC 8-102 (9) You can report your withdrawals as debt instruments, as an OID. Call any broker and ask for your CUSIP number! Tell them you want to track a bond and you don’t have the CUSIP and give them your SS#. I have already done this! Question: Last week of redemption period, what do to? What mortgage? Has he done a Unlawful Detainer? What state, judicial or non judicial? They do a UD to get you out of there. Unlawful Detainer to get you out. Based on a landlord tenant agreement, where is the agreement? How did the trustee get, you have not laid claim, you don’t have a claim going. That is why they are throwing you out of the house. How does he do that? Go read UCC 8-505 and UCC 8-508 in the UCC. You have to find out who the broker or clearing corporation is and you gotta send a written communication, this might be a good time to go into that. I’m going into the UCC. Hang on! UCC 8-505 says the duty of securities intermediary with respect to payments and distribution. The securities intermediary shall take action to obtain a payment or distribution made by the issuer of a financial asset. You know what I would do…. I would find out who the Title company insurance company is, find out who the Errors and Omissions carrier is and tell them you want to file a claim. Tell them you want a release of lien and re- conveyance on the property. Because of the E&O claim. If they don’t give you the release and re-conveyance the Title company has that right in California under 29.41.7. If you can’t locate the beneficiary of record or the lender which you can’t because of the securitization then you can ask and in 30 days they have to give you a release of lien or re-conveyance. The Trustee does and you can of to the Title company and you want a release and re-conveyance because of the E&O claim you have, you want a form for it. Look under 2607 (a) of Title 12. That’s what I would do if I were you. They will call the Title company they said the property was free and clear with no encumbrances. They are liable if there is any cloud on title. Go to www.myprivateaudio.com to sign up for the classes with Jean. That is Angela Starks web page. I go into UCC, Trust Law, Accounting and Tax Law. But they are all related! All of this stuff comes into play. JK I will show you how to win anything in court….anything! Nancy: I have some tax questions. I have written promissory notes. JK: Why send notes? The bill is a check! JK: is the IRS going to give you a refund unless you report the credit these people are using? They are using your credit. No one is doing redemption correctly. JK: Endorse the bill “Pay to the order of Department of Treasury Timothy Geithner, IMF Governor: Debit the sum said to the account of whomever sent you the bill and credit to your account/SS#”. It’s a charge back. Pay it to the IRS that’s the return, then charge it to whomever sent you the bill. Credit the memory of my account and give them your SS of the amount. What you are doing, you are paying it to the IRS then they are doing a charge to (the utility company) or whomever, then they credit to the memory of your account. That is how you do redemption. That is the proper way to do it! I wrote out a check and BOE on a napkin and they gave me a receipt for it. Thank you for your payment! I wrote it on a piece of paper a napkin. People go to prison because they didn’t pay the tax. You can’t create debt instruments! Take the bill and turn it into a money order. That’s what the coupon is for: do a pay to the order of on the coupon. Send it to the CFO and pay to Geithner…..etc. The Secretary of the Treasury is not Geithner he is Mendez Torres. They moved the Treasury to Puerto Rico in 1921. What did you do with the bill? I fill out the coupon “pay to the order of “ and sent it back to the IRS Charge it to the IRS they are the ones that are sending the bill. They are using your account. IRS put on the bill: Pay to the Department of Treasury, T. Geither Governor IMF Debit/charge the IRS Credit/ the memory of my account / ss# How are you going to pay when there is no money? The bill is a debt instrument, there sending you a check really. The bill is a check. Well I do this all the time. File a 1040 with that and report it as income. Then you do a 1040 V which is the payment voucher then fill out the 1096. There is no money; there can be no profits if there is no money. A top gift and estate tax attorney. A donation of your property to the county. Your mortgage is a donation. Under Title 26>B>11>A>IV § 2055 you deduct the entire amount. It is 100% tax liability. It should be reported as a donation. So your not getting your donation. Treat is as a donation. All monetary transactions are donations. There is no money. Unified Tax Credit go read publication 950. Have someone send you a bill then do a money order on the bill! If you do a money order just endorse it for payment. They are using your credit! They (the IRS or whomever) uses your credit! The bill represents the amount of your credit that they are using. Utility, gas, trash dumpster etc, electric, IRS they use your credit they are broke. Understand that whomever sends you a bill is using your credit. Endorse it for payment and send it back that constitutes payment. Whomever they send the bill to is whose credit they are using. That is why you endorse it for processing. Pay to: XX Debit: XX Credit: XX Report it as income to you and assess the tax! You must make a presentment to hold someone liable. Your failure to process is not my failure to tender! Moving on! Maggie from Arizona: I am gonna go down a different path. Summary: I bought a house with seller finance and we had the land title company act as the account servicer, they went bankrupt and taken over by some one else. The new account servicer pays the seller. The account servicer is holding the original documents there is a minimal monthly fee for them to do that. Question, what would be there benefit for $18.00 a month to do all that work? Is there something hidden I am not catching? Go see the original note at the servicer. They don’t have the note. If you get a judgment, and do a Pay to the Order of Dept of Treasury ….debit to the Judge/ send him a tax bill. CREDIT CARD: Do a conditional acceptance on Proof of Claim. The DTC owns both sides of a credit card. Mandatory to do a counter claim! That is how you identify yourself as a creditor. Tax returns are filed on Passover April 14 to 22nd. BEAST BELGIM ELECTRONIC AUTOMATED SURVEYLANCE TERMINAL Tied into BIS the Bank of International Settlement. Title 26 >A>1>B>IV § 141 “private debt instrument”. Force them to pay tax do an OID Do a margin call on them. 50% credit - that is why they want you to put a bond up. Read Title 26 > B > 11> A >III § 2032 (e) 11 (????) the court has to cover their capital transfer tax they haven’t paid. They have to put a bond up or release you. They are holding you for the funds. They are using your exclusion to keep you in bondage to cover their margin. Ask them to File a 1099 OID for them to identify who is the payor(us) and recipient(court) of the funds. If they are not the source of the funds they have to release you. You have made an offer a debt tendered and refused is a debt paid. Writing checks on a closed account: We endorsed the back of the check: Not for deposit EFT only for discharge of debt Signed by AR without recourse. Title 15 >96>1 § 7001-7006 the Uniform Electronic Transfer Act and Uniform Electronic Signature Act. Also UCC 1-108 MERS is under Electronic Transfer ACT that is why it is not governed by Article 3. Do a conditional acceptance on Proof of Claim, prove your authority to make the presentment. Use a constructive trust along with the executor letter. Constructive trust is what a court of equity uses to give restitution and reimbursement to plaintiff. Use a constructive trust when the person is in possession of money they are not entitled to. That’s how you get restitution and reimbursement. Every time you go to court and they bring it against you they are using a constructive trust in equity against you. So I appoint the Judge the Fiduciary Trustee and make him liable for all the taxes and they drop the case. You have the power of Appointment under the Power of Appointment Act of 1951 you are the Donor because it is a Class 5 Gift and Estate Tax. The donor has total control over the power of appointment. You can appoint anyone and they have to accept that! Read 2038 and 2514 of Title 26, that’s the power of appointment act under Title 26. It was passed in 1951. From your point of view using the constructive trust with the Executive Letter. D. Clarence is missing this from his letter. You have total power in the power of appointment. Everything is a Class 5 Gift and Estate Tax and the Donor controls it all. You are the holder of the Power of Appointment. Can that constructive trust work in an eviction? They gave me a Grant Deed and I defended the property. 3 years later I am still here. They did an unlawful detainer. What did you do? I did a constructive trust and affirmative defense. 50 % of the owners of the notes have to Certify before they can do a substitution of Trustee, under 2934 of the CA civil code. They are not holders in due course they take it with all defenses and claims. RE Executor Letter: The office is vacant. As the Donor you have the Power of Appointment Act of 1951 you can appoint yourself as the Executor. Put in letter: Under 2038 & 2514 under Title 26 I am appointing myself the Special Occupant of the legal estate of the decedent by absolute estate. As the Donor Beneficiary of this constructive trust, I am appointing myself; I am claiming the office of the special occupant of the legal estate. It’s not a legal estate because there is no Executor. Intestate is when an estate has no heir or beneficiary. That is why the Judges are doing constructive trust in equity to give restitution and reimbursement to the plaintiff which is the lender or servicing company. Because there is no heir or beneficiary. You are the heir or beneficiary. You are not stepping up to the plate and that is why you are not winning in court. They took me out of their system. I’m not even in their system now. Caller: Once you establish the trust you don’t need to get their bonds as enforcement? JK Just make them liable for the tax. Taxable termination, I appointing myself the Donor as the Executor of the Estate and making you the Trustee by Power of Appointment of the Power of Appointment Act of 1951. What are they gonna say? I’m claiming the Executor Office of the legal office of the decedents. You cannot do it as the Grantor; you have to do it as the Donor. You have total power and you’re not using it! I have the original statues, public law for the Power of Appointment in 1951. Caller: What about the General Post We are sending letters to the Postal Inspector? Do you use the General Post with the Executor Letter? JK: Yes I would! Send them home without any porridge. If you don’t’ know what your rights are you don’t have any. UCC 1-201 rights are remedy’s, if you don’t know your remedy you don’t have any! That’s why most people are not winning in court when they go, they don’t know there remedy. When it involves real property it has to be in a land court. None of these courts are land courts! Challenge subject matter jurisdiction. Most of these courts don’t have jurisdiction. If the real party of interest is not before the court then the court cannot make a ruling. NO!! Venue you are not in proper venue…, it must be a land court! They are getting subject matter jurisdiction by…. Contract! Go in and say I am here by “special appearance upon proof of claim”. I will conditionally accept your offer on proof this is a court of record and this is a land court that has jurisdiction, and venue under the constitution to litigate land cases. Which is what a foreclosure case is! None of these courts have jurisdiction to foreclose on anyone’s property. You are waiving jurisdiction you can’t waive subject matter. Raise subject matter jurisdiction. I have a letter from Donna Boran I have a copy of this letter: They took it off of the internet it is in Vol 34: abolishing local action rules the first step toward modernizing jurisdiction and venue in Tennessee, these people don’t have venue to foreclose on anyone’s property because they are not land courts. This documents the entire thing! This is the law review. Here is another thing…..let me give you this case cite….PONZI vs FESSENDEN 258 US 254 you can down load it off of the internet. It says that a court has dual jurisdictions. Out of the case quoted: A court has two jurisdictions. “We live in the jurisdiction of 2 sovereignty’s each having its own system of courts to declare and enforce its laws in common territory. It would be impossible for such courts to fulfill their respective functions without embarrassing conflict unless rules were adopted by them to avoid it. The people for whose benefit these two systems are maintained are deeply interested that each system shall be effective and uninhibited in its vindication of its laws. The situation requires therefore not only definite rules fixing the powers of the courts in cases of jurisdiction over the same persons and things and actual litigation but also a spirit of reciprocal commodity and mutual assistance promote due and orderly procedure.” You have a dual jurisdiction…hummmm! Listen to this: “The chief rule which preserves our two systems of courts from actual conflict of jurisdiction is that the court which first takes subject matter of the litigation into its control rather this be person or property must be permitted to exhaust its remedy. To attain which it assumes control before the other court shall attempt to take it for its purpose.” The principle is stated by Justice Mathews in Kovell vs Haymen 111 US ??? Which ever court even if the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction and they take control of it by your contract, they have to exhaust that litigation. But if you challenge subject matter jurisdiction then they have to prove it! A land court in Florida is the county court. Every state constitution has this in it. Most of them have a county court, which is called a land court. Only the land court has venue over the foreclosure. None of these court that are foreclosing have venue. No one is challenging venue! It is the court of common pleas! Go look at your constitution! Ask them if they have jurisdiction over land. Where does it say it in the state constitution? See where the jurisdiction is conferred on them to do foreclosures. Challenge venue not jurisdiction. Venue! Challenge Venue! If you lost your home you can go back in based on venue! You can get a void judgment, you know what a void judgment is void on the face because the court lack subject matter jurisdiction. In California it is 473 9 (d) of the Civil code. California has a code of civil procedure and a civil code, they don’t know it. People don’t read the statutes, don’t go in and contract with them. That is how they get jurisdiction. This is what this is telling you! They do it by consent. The Judge tries to get you to consent. What are you doing when you testify? They can’t do that if you challenge venue, they don’t have venue. I don’t know anyone that has raised venue. Venue is more important than jurisdiction. Let me go into the entomology dictionary. Look up words in the entomology dictionary and look up the definitions. I’m going to look up the word Venue and read it to you. Venue: Early 14th century, a coming for the purpose of attack from old French, venue coming, from the feminine passive participle veneer to come from ???? to come, from the pie base gwa to go or come from, see come a sense in place where a case in law is tried, is first recorded in the 1530s extended to locality in general especially cite of a concert or sporting event, a change of venue is from blackstone. Come means to approach land, to come to ones self, recover, arrive, assemble to go from, to come, he goes to be born substitution of o for u is scribele change before minimums. Originally manunke some modern past tense from came is middle English the old noun……to be productive with herbs. It means land! Do you see how important this is. Only a court that has venue over land has jurisdiction. Do you know anyone that has ever raised venue? These courts don’t have venue. They have it only by your consent. Go in by special appearance and don’t consent. It works to!! You have to stand your ground! Next caller: Jean I have a couple of questions. I have a DVD of you a few years ago. It was from a seminar that you did. It is the same thing I am hearing now. What you saying is accurate and something I appreciate. My question is the 8281 Form. We have a friend in trouble using the 1099 OID and got a big check under $200,000.00 and they paid bills got things done then the IRS came back after him. They want to find out if you know what your doing. He is in San Diego District court then want him to, the are attempting to force the summon on him. He is now doing an appeal. JK: File Form 4490 and ask them where there claim is. Prove their claim! I would make them prove up their claim. Even though he didn’t file the 8281. Show proof of claim. Make them show proof of claim. What they are trying to do it is to put him in prison. What we have done so far is based on pure law and they have just make all kinds of errors. JK Maybe they are not stupid, they know what they are doing. The IRS is just rolling over him. They ignore everything that he has submitted. Judge writes orders that the way the US Attorney is telling the Judge to write. The Proof of Claim should be sent to the IRS. Is the address on the form? JK yes it is So, don’t send it to the court ??? the US Attorney. JK give a copy to the US Attorney So if he does an 8281 is not an issue right now. Just the proof of claim. JK where is there claim to invalidate his claim? Is there a publication for the 4490 to explain it. JK yes there is, I believe so. Hang on a minute and I will pull this up! Form 4490 Proof of Claim for IR Taxes. The undersigned Officer of the IRS a duly authorized representative of the US does hereby duly swear and says that the so and so is duly indebted to the US for the amount of…… OK there is, it says use this…….IR Manual # 5.5.4 Proof of Claim procedures. It says use 4490 Proof of Claim for IR tax when filing a claim in probate or in non bankruptcy proceedings. Send them a letter that under 2038 and 2514 under the Power of Appointment Act of 1951 you are appointing them as the Executor of the Estate of the decedent and that makes them liable for all the tax on the estate. The Executor has to pay the tax! You could appoint the Judge the Executor. They will run out of the court room! This is an actual IR Manual it is 5.5.4.1. It talks about Form 10492 Notice of Fed Tax Due under 31 USC 3713. Read the Uniform Trust Code Section 406 or 407 tells you how to form a trust. You can do it orally! You have the Power of Appointment Act of 1951 under sections 2838 and 2514 of Title 26 as the donor and beneficiary of record. You are appointing the Judge the Executor of the legal estate of the decedent. Ask him if he has his track shoes? I’ll conditionally accept your offer on proof of claim, if you have the authority to make a presentment. The attorney’s sent me a $3,000.00 property bill and I did a conditional acceptance on it and I never heard from them again. None of these courts (California) have any jurisdiction to do anything. The real party in interest is the President of Mexico. Under the Treaty of ????? it was changed without proper authorization. Under CA 473 (d) on all these unlawful detainer they are void judgments on the face because they never had the authority to foreclose. Ask if they have 50% of the certification and acknowledgement of the owners of the notes, and who are the owners of the notes or the securities they are foreclosing on. Ask them if they are a holder in due course, ask if they took it subject to the defenses and claims that a payor could assert against the payee. Isn’t it true under 16 CFR 433.2 (FTC - electronic code) that you took it subject to all the defenses and claims that the payor could assert against the payee. That is the disclaimer that they have to provide you with. Tell them you want your proceeds from the sale of the security! Where is the check? Learn how to handle yourself! I actually got one of the 4490 filled out and filed with the court. They actually filed this one in bankruptcy court. It is in the District of Colorado, receivership. Title 18 claim is an abandonment! File an en rem complaint to mitigate it. It is abandoned property. Supplemental Rule C toby.butterworth@gmail.com classes Caller: I did the OID taught by Winston and she is damaged. Coaches should have come back and fixed it. David Clarence told her to write checks on an open account and they bounced. She now has to pay the bill and bounced check fee as well as have a visit from the police. She now has an IRS 100% lien because of the OID. Use the bill as a check: do a Pay to the Order Of It is just a letter. Do they have an amount on the bill? Yes Do a Pay to the Order Of. Endorse it for payment, Pay to the order of the Department of Treasury Charge the sum to: Medical Facility/Acct Number is the Bill Number/Tax ID Credit to the memory of myself/ SS#. Sign in red ink! Not blue ink. You must be the last signature on the page/sign on the back of the page also. They only see last signature! Your signature has to be the last signature on the page so they can’t sign anything after your signature. I can show you a IRS practice manual that every document has to be signed in red ink. Ask for a 1099 OID for the proof of the source of the funds. I want to see the 1099 OID that identify’s them as the source of the funds and I am the recipient! Please send me a check for the funds that I gave you! I funded them! As soon as I get the OID then I will send you the funds, if you are the source of the funds. If they don’t send me the OID I will send one showing them as the recipient of the funds. THAT IS A MARGIN CALL! I told the Judge: Show me the OID that shows you as the source of the funds. The 1099 OID the payor identify’s the person owing the tax. If you’re the recipient of the funds then you don’t owe the tax. Caller: How do you deal with an IRS levy? JK it is a secret lien. When they assess tax, when they bring a claim do a 4490 on them tell them to prove their claim. They are dipping into your account. Send me a bill and I will do a Money Order/Pay order on it! Did you get a bill for the tax? Yes they claim I owe so many hundreds of thousands of dollars. Do a pay to the order of and charge it to their account credit the memory of your account. File a 1099 OID showing you are the source of the funds. Show them the IRS as the recipient of the funds! When have you ever seen anyone assess the IRS a tax. They are sending you a bill aren’t they? They are using your credit, they are no different than anyone else. How? Do a money order, take your bill and do a money order that is assessing the tax now they have to pay the tax and file the OID and show them as the recipient of the funds. Read IRS Manual 5.5.1 and 5.5.4.1 Proof of claim procedures and non bankruptcy insolvency cases. Insolvency is a dead person. Read 3128 and 3113 of Title 31 when a person has proof they can draw on the payment???. Caller: What is the possibility to go back and get funds that were paid on credit cards that were paid in the past. JK yes you can make a claim. Yes you can get it back! They do the same thing on credit cards that they do on a mortgage loan. The DTC owns both sides of the account. The DTC is a trust holding company; they are holding all that money in trust because you have not made a claim to it Under Article 8. Caller: Do you utilize a process to get rid of a fine that was assessed on a company, fraudulent frame up and they assessed a $14,000.00 fine of which I paid a couple payments. I got a letter saying they were going back into the system. I did not want to contract and I refused to sign other paperwork. Now they (the district court- AG) are telling me I will be locked up if I don’t handle it. JK tell them you want a 1099 OID, tell them you conditionally accept his offer if he can provide you with proof of claim. Caller: They want it paid by postal money order. JK ask them where they get the authority to make you pay with a specific instrument. Do a conditional acceptance upon proof of claim! Caller: How do you remove a criminal charge? JK expungement! I can show you how to do that. Many thanks to the Sender/Writer!

NESARA & GESARA News: Urgent Alert – Everything Just Exposed!!!

You may have heard that it’s possible to legally amend tax returns for up to three years, potentially resulting in a full refund of all income taxes paid during those years—this includes Social Security and Medicare taxes. But is this true? If so, which forms must be filed, and how can you ensure that these forms are filed correctly to receive your refunds without issues? In this week’s Freedom Hour presentation, Peymon Mottahedeh, founder of Freedom Law School, will provide clear answers to these questions. With over 30 years of experience and Freedom Law School’s 27-year track record, Peymon and his team have successfully helped countless Americans break free from IRS overreach, deception, and unfair taxation. Visit our website to learn about the Seven Steps to income tax freedom. FreedomLawSchool.org

President Trump has proposed eliminating all federal income and payroll taxes,and replace them with tariffs on imports and other taxes on foreigners. How can you be part of this movement to make these bold changes a reality? Imagine how your family could benefit from a tax-free future — more freedom and wealth right away. Can you be income tax free now? Peymon, the founder of Freedom Law School in 1996, grew up in totalitarian Iran, where freedom was a distant dream. At just 14 years old in 1977, he moved to the "land of the free" — and home of the brave had turned into the meek and land of the indentured slaves. Since then, Peymon has helped hundreds of thousands of people uncover the truth about tax laws. With over 30 years of experience and Freedom Law School’s 27-year track record, Peymon and his team have successfully helped countless Americans break free from IRS, deception, fear robbery and slavery. You can do the same when you visit our website at FreedomLawSchool.org.

Having slapped a Bankster with a T.I.L.A. Complaint sent to the Federal Reserve, a reply was soon received, let's see what it has to say. Link to related videos "SLAP - A - BANKSTER" with T. I. L. A. COMPLAINT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4XvzS7cpVw TRUTH IN LENDING WILL SET YOU FREE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ad4wnSE87JE

Emergency ALERT: Extreme Life-Threatening Weather Hits Us, With 10 Inches Of Snow On The Gulf Coast!