-
The Dirty Side of the U.S. Department of Justice: The LaRouche Case
laroucheorganizationOn August 31, 1995, a panel including famous civil rights attorney J.L. Chestnut, former House Judiciary Committee member Rep. James Mann, as well as other elected officials and human rights activists convened two-day hearings outside of Washington, D.C. to investigate U.S. Department of Justice misconduct. The hearings spotlighted several cases of the DOJ's notorious targeting of African-American elected officials (known in FBI parlance as 'Operation Fruemenschen'), the LaRouche case, and others. This week's LaRouche Show video is an excerpt from those hearings featuring the LaRouche case, and includes testimony from former U.S. Attorney Ramsey Clark, Atty. Odin Anderson, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and Lyndon LaRouche himself. In a recent online dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche, journalist and talk show host/podcaster Garland Nixon offered an important insight regarding the breakout of LaRouche's ideas and the movement he created under the current political conditions: "..I think one of the things that has happened over the past is the imperial power had to ostracize, attack, isolate your organization, because you were one of the few organizations that were wise to exactly who they were ...'this is who the British Empire is, and this is what they do.' And as the British Empire starts to come to grips to exactly the reality they’re dealing with now, I think the necessity for going after your organization will recede, and I think your organization will be able to flourish and do some of the really good work that you’re doing more in the open, and not be as pushed into the shadows as you have been." Nixon's reference to the "ostracize, attack, and isolate" methods used against Lyndon LaRouche and his collaborators are a large part of the reason that many viable solutions to life and death issues over the past decades have been written off simply because they were associated with Lyndon LaRouche. You may have heard something like: "Great idea, but, AAAARGH, that's LaRouche!" If you, like many others, have encountered such hysterical LaRouche Derangement Syndrome outbursts, this week's LaRouche show will provide you with some useful ammunition to counter the calumny and finally allow LaRouche's proposals (like his Oasis Plan for the Middle East, for example) to now flourish.315 views -
LaRouche: "The Middle East as a Strategic Crossroads"
laroucheorganizationIn June of 2002, Lyndon LaRouche was invited to deliver the keynote speech to a two-day conference on “The Role of Oil and Gas in World Politics” held at the Zayed Center for Coordination and Follow-Up in Abu Dhabi, UAE. On the dais with LaRouche were UAE Oil Minister Obeid Bin Saif Al Nasseri and former Iraqi Oil Minister Essam Abdul-Aziz Al Galabi. Mr. LaRouche's presentation, titled “The Middle East as a Strategic Crossroads,” focused on the critical question of confronting the real enemy of the peoples in that region, namely the lack of fresh water and increasing desertification. Since 1975, Lyndon LaRouche had repeatedly put forward a comprehensive plan for such development known as the "Oasis Plan" which, still today, remains the unique pathway to peace. The event also included a dynamic Q & A session between LaRouche and conference participants, included in this video.356 views -
This Year, U.S. Must Re-Declare Independence From Britain
laroucheorganizationAs we enter the new year, all patriotic, enlightened citizens of this nation should resolve to implement the required policy concepts which will prevent the United States from destroying itself and others as the result of lunatic military and imperial policies which have crept into our policy making institutions since Winston Churchill’s post-1945 influence on the “little” successor to FDR, Harry Truman. This British influence was acknowledged by former U.S. Secretary of State and self-admitted British agent of influence Henry Kissinger in his speech to London’s Chatham House on May 10, 1982: “In my period in office, the British played a seminal part in certain American bilateral negotiations with the Soviet Union—indeed, they helped draft the key document. In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department—a practice which, with all affection for things British, I would not recommend be made permanent. But it was symptomatic…” The policies which have resulted in the NATO-Russian war in Ukraine, the war in Southwest Asia, and the toppling of Assad’s regime in Syria, are all devious products of the British “Great Game” mindset which aims to divide and conquer certain regions which could otherwise act as crucial development corridors linking nearly every continent on the planet in a massive World Landbridge project, as has been the policy of Lyndon LaRouche and his wife Helga since the late 1990s. Today’s Manhattan Project, the last before the New Year, will focus mainly on tracing the British origin and continued dominance of U.S. foreign policy since 1945, beginning with a historical overview of “Operation Unthinkable,” the 1945 British military plan to preemptively launch a surprise attack to “impose the will of the United States and the British Empire” on the Soviet Union. EIR researcher Richard Freeman will join us to give that report, along with other presentations by UK Column editor Mike Robinson and TLO spokesman Harley Schlanger. Speakers: Richard Freeman, Harley Schlanger, and Mike Robinson1.33K views 4 comments